Talk:Prometric

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

== Hey guys....

Untitled

What about the controversy related to IIM CAT 2009(Common Admission Test). This must be mentioned at this page. ==

Did you read the article?Iulus Ascanius (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I read the article. This is the external link---> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/IIMs-to-review-Prometric-CAT-contract/articleshow/5312443.cms

There is already a discussion of the issue in the article, with multiple links. Iulus Ascanius (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Psychology

hello all... Why this article is put under the psychology?--Yogendra.rai (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I removed the project banner.Iulus Ascanius (talk) 21:56, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A marketing article

The "The Prometric Values Promise" section seems to be a marketing advertisement. And the "Controversy" section has been deleted recently. CapitanPrimate (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This article contains excessive promotional language. Balta katei 17:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prometric no longer subsidiary of ETS

Prometric was acquired by BPEA in January 2018.

http://www.bpeasia.com/private-equity/our-portfolio/ https://www.prometric.com/en-us/about-prometric/pages/history.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:0:D50:4048:8924:8594:D824:70A7 (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tampered-computers-gave-neet-applicants-a-lifeline/article19360023.ece. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 16:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]