Talk:Sanity Code
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Sanity Code appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 February 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bunnypranav talk 14:30, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that in 1949, several athletic conferences, including the Southeastern Conference, discussed withdrawing from the NCAA after the Sanity Code, which barred athletic scholarships, went into effect?
- Source: Pay for Play: A History of Big-Time College Athletic Reform (Discussion on withdrawal is on p. 97, while p. 93 includes the provision that financial aid be limited only to needs-based assistance)
- ALT1: ... that in 1949, the University of Virginia threatened to leave the National Collegiate Athletic Association if the Sanity Code, which barred athletic scholarhips, was not amended? Source: Pay for Play: A History of Big-Time College Athletic Reform, p. 97
- ALT2: ... that several universities and athletic conferences in the Southern United States were opposed to the NCAA's Sanity Code, a 1948 set of rules that barred athletic scholarhips? Source: Pay for Play: A History of Big-Time College Athletic Reform, p. 94; Where Football is King: A History of the SEC, p. 15
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Troupeau Bleu
Created by JJonahJackalope (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 61 past nominations.
JJonahJackalope (talk) 15:11, 8 January 2025 (UTC).
- Article is new enough, well sourced, seems neutral, Earwig shows 30% but no copyvio, hook verifies (using Google Books).
Good to go on ALT1, which I consider the most interesting. Great work! Departure– (talk) 16:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)