This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Presidents of the United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Presidents of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Presidents of the United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesPresidents of the United States
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
This article is based on sources exclusively from today. I propose we merge this article into The Trump Organization until it shows that it qualifies to be a Wikipedia article. WP:TRUMPCRUFT, and the fact that this article has little to not encyclopedic value. WiinterU03:18, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Doesn't matter how old sources are for articles to be able to use them. What matters most is that the linked sources have the required facts, which these do. It seems like there has been a fair amount of quality news coverage so this article could stay up.
I do admit though that it certainly seems logical to make this article a section in The Trump Organization's article, but that has the risk of making that page too large, seeing as this is a subsidiary of Donald Trump's technology business, so it is more appropriate to go onto that company's page. Qwerty123M (talk) 05:41, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TRUMPCRUFT assumes the "latest crap Trump got himself into" is a tweet, rumor, or event. A network operator (not even directly owned or made by Trump, mind you) is neither of a tweet, rumor, or event. Also, this article has little to not [sic] encyclopedic value is a real blanket statement since you never clarify how it isn't encyclopedic. TheGoofWasHere (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]