Talk:Windows Vista
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Windows Vista article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 6 months ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | Windows Vista was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Padlock?
[edit]Hello, can you add the padlock to this protected page? Protected pages usually have padlocks. 2001:448A:11A0:1425:7C99:A6C6:815:68CD (talk) 05:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Done, I added pp-icon. yvanyblog(talk) 22:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2023
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Windows Vista did get an update to SHA-2 as the updates from April 2012 and above were duel signed with SHA-1 and 2 but requires specific updates that Microsoft released to get the windows update servers working again. 2601:840:4100:2DE0:5123:7575:4EBE:8C19 (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 00:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2024
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Reinstate {{pp-semi|small=yes}}. 2600:1002:B01C:9E5C:DB9C:8CA:F41F:A71E (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
"oac" in description
[edit]I was looking for information on Vista, but this weird "oac" completely distracted me. If it doesn't have a purpose, can it be edited out? Senturkey (talk) 16:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2025
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
At the last sentence of the Cost section, it says "These prices have since been reduced to $319 and $199 respectively." When it should now state "The prices were later reduced to $319 and $199 respectively."
Saying that "these prices have since been reduced" implies that Windows Vista is still currently offered from Microsoft at these prices, but Windows Vista is longer sold by Microsoft. "The prices were later reduced" better encompasses the past tense. Boyfromthesand (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Done PianoDan (talk) 20:34, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2025
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Out-of-band patches section claims that an update for the "Text Services Framework patch" vulnerability was released for Windows Vista. While one can certainly install the Windows Server 2008 patch on Windows Vista, as they are architecturally compatible, neither the cited source nor any news article I could find support, that Microsoft released a separate patch for Vista, nor did they seem to have endorsed installing the Server 2008 patch on Vista. Which is why I request the mentioning of that update to be removed.
Techmolt (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
References
Done You're correct in that there was no mention in the cited source of Vista as a product that specifically received the patch. I've removed the relevant text. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
The redirect Draft:Windows 6 (AKA Windows Vista) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 23 § Draft:Windows 6 (AKA Windows Vista) until a consensus is reached. GTrang (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Is this true?
[edit]In the article it was stated that:
"Final release Service Pack 2 with June 2025 security update (6.0.6003.23351) / June 10, 2025; 7 days ago"
However the reference does not match with the claim:
x64 Tabanlı Sistemler İçin Windows Vista Güncelleştirmesi (KB4036162) Son Değiştirme: 17.08.2017 Boyut: 14,1 MB UpdateID: 1f5e16e0-8277-41be-80ed-24be052dc4a6
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/4036162 79.123.129.20 (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Computing articles
- High-importance Computing articles
- B-Class software articles
- Top-importance software articles
- B-Class software articles of Top-importance
- All Software articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class Microsoft articles
- High-importance Microsoft articles
- B-Class Microsoft Windows articles
- High-importance Microsoft Windows articles
- WikiProject Microsoft Windows articles
- WikiProject Microsoft articles
- Top-importance Microsoft Windows articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- High-importance software articles
- B-Class software articles of High-importance