User talk:Dv24mail

Kishor Kantha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kishor Kantha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and all the content after the lead was unreferenced. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kishor Kantha (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

And why is it notable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kishor Kantha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 13:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dv24mail! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 13:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hafezzi Charitable Society of Bangladesh moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hafezzi Charitable Society of Bangladesh. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because I found some unverified and unsourced content, so I removed it. Although there are several citations, some are placed inappropriately near unrelated sentences. Additionally, phrases like "we organize fun" are not suitable for an encyclopedic article. Please work on improving the tone and sourcing before submitting it for review. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 00:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Probfly IT for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Probfly IT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probfly IT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pizza on Pineapple ^{(Let's eat🍕)} 10:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All sources cited in this article appear to be acceptable. I think this article can be continued. If there is a problem with the article, you can help solve it. Dv24mail (talk) 11:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Owais Al Qarni. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 12:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I actually want to transfer the article of Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir to their official name.

The correct name of this organization is Bangladesh Islami Chhatrashibir.

Official name: Chhatrashibir (not Chhatra Shibir)

See this website and en web and one news There are also numerous news sources with the organization's official name. Dv24mail (talk) 12:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Bangladesh Islami Chatra Shibir

Hello Dv24mail, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bangladesh Islami Chatra Shibir, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shadik Kayem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadik Kayem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadik Kayem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Somajyoti ✉ 17:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:কিশোরকণ্ঠ ম্যাগাজিনের ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০২৫ সালের একটি প্রচ্ছদ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:কিশোরকণ্ঠ ম্যাগাজিনের ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০২৫ সালের একটি প্রচ্ছদ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rafiqul Islam Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafiqul Islam Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafiqul Islam Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Somajyoti ✉ 07:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I've noticed that you have created numerous pages without adding in-depth sources to them, please read WP:Three, WP:N, WP:N(OC), if you need any help from me, feel free to ask! BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 06:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 13:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

I have noticed your behaviour in AfDs after getting a reference from a sockpuppetry investigation, if you need any help with AfDs, feel free to ask. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 11:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shafiqul Islam Masud

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shafiqul Islam Masud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shafiqul Islam Masud (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 05:58, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nurul Islam Bulbul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nurul Islam Bulbul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurul Islam Bulbul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 07:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mahanagar Express moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mahanagar Express. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tasnim Jara (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tasnim Jara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nasiruddin Patwary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandpur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nasiruddin Patwary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nasiruddin Patwary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasiruddin Patwary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 04:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Al Imran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abdullah Al Imran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 13:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]