Jump to content

User talk:82.42.214.75

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Creator Clash, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. --NFSreloaded (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah totally. 82.42.214.75 (talk) 11:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

If you have an issue with me and User:Bly000 about our editing actions, take it to Creator Clash's talk page instead of only stating "Stick to the facts" repeatedly. Otherwise, if you keep on edit warring and ignoring our requests for a proper discussion, this might have to be left to the admins. Thank you for reading. HugeMackerel (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

[edit]

Stop icon Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bly000 (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]