User talk:Atacc1

Welcome!

Hello, Atacc1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Atacc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Atacc

A tag has been placed on Atacc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:40, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

I read your comments that had been placed regarding Atacc. For clarity's sake, a charity most certainly can advertise—have you not seen ads for the United Way? Indeed, we're advertising for donations right at the top of your screen. Charities can and do advertise just like any organization. The reason your page was an ad is for the very reasons you put forth on the talk page. Wikipedia is not intended as a free webhost or to alleviate the responsibilities of your organization in doing its work, nor to "get information out". Rather, it is intended as a reference work to summarize information already published by reliable sources. If you need a web page with information to slow the volume of inquiries you get, there are many free or low-cost webhosts out there. This is not one of them. Any article we have must conform to our notability and neutral point of view standards. We also ask that those closely affiliated with a subject who may have a conflict of interest suggest things to other editors regarding subjects where a conflict may exist rather than editing themselves.

None of this, of course, means that you are not welcome to edit here, as you are. But I did want to clarify for you why the article deleted was not acceptable. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on your user talk page or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. --VS ^talk 10:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]