User talk:Chess25652

Proposed deletion of RAR (Chess)

Hello, Chess25652. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, RAR (Chess), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nsk92 (talk) 23:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Jumpytoo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chess.com have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jumpytoo Talk 23:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sock puppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DKBRAO. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mz7 (talk) 06:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chess25652 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not actually a duplicate account. Different person also. Chess25652 (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's hard to understand the overlap without concluding there's at least some WP:MEAT happening here. Yamla (talk) 18:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chess25652 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

DKBRAO and I do seem to have made similar edits, but there was no actual collaboration. Maybe we just had the same idea (e.g. adding to RAR, or creating RAR (Chess)). Who knows? It is not possible to prove that collaboration occurred. If there was, the edit to RAR would have linked to the RAR (chess) article. ~~~~

Decline reason:

Mention of Joseph Truelson also seems to be a common element between these two accounts. Admins can look at the now-deleted article at RAR (Chess). EdJohnston (talk) 02:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chess25652 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That doesn't mean that we collaborated, because we didn't. It's because we both know Joseph Truelson.

Decline reason:

The multiple attempts to insert Truelson's name into Wikipedia within a short space of time makes it highly unlikely that your edits were coincidental. Even if you genuinely do not know the person behind the DKBRAO account, you are still acting as a meatpuppet for Wikipedia's purposes. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Gummy Bear!

	Gummy Bear!
	mythical revolutionary bears YoyoPuppy (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]