User talk:EvergreenFir
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
I think Peep&Pocoyo10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is a new sock of Zorn. They're using the phrases "nothing in article indicates than" and "already placed in subcat," in edit summaries, both of which are common to their socks. wizzito | say hello! 16:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Wizzito sure looks that way! Blocked EvergreenFir (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Here are some recent IPs that you should mass revert or block, likely Zorn based on the whole edit pattern:
- 104.128.111.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) (note: geolocates to Honolulu)
- 152.179.25.78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 98.154.37.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- wizzito | say hello! 19:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- The third IP on this list was active as recently as today. I suggest you block it. wizzito | say hello! 19:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Wizzito looks like someone beat me to it. I don't think that first IP is SoZ though EvergreenFir (talk) 04:32, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- The third IP on this list was active as recently as today. I suggest you block it. wizzito | say hello! 19:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Here are some recent IPs that you should mass revert or block, likely Zorn based on the whole edit pattern:
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).
- An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.
- A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
- History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.
- An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Way back in October 2023 you blocked ImAWubbox1984. After that there continued to be problems, including unconstructive unblock requests at UTRS and sockpuppetry. However, they have now made an unblock request at UTRS appeal #103893 which seems to me to be much more reasonable than some previous ones. Also, as far as I can see six months have passed since this editor did anything on en.wikipedia or UTRS, and meanwhile they have contributed to simple.wikipedia, as far as I can see constructively and without problems. I therefore don't see any reason not to unblock. However, do you wish to make any comment? JBW (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JBW thank you for checking with me. I trust your judgement and have no objections. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. JBW (talk) 10:23, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Imran Khan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (definite or indefinite article at beginning of name) on a "All RFCs" request for comment, and at Talk:Hugues de Payens on a "History and geography" request for comment, and at Talk:List of active separatist movements in Europe on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment, and at Talk:Sanctioned Suicide on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:39, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
This same vandalism has been going on for some time at this article, from what I can tell, at least a year now. Is there any range that covers all these same IPs that can get blocked from editing, or would protection on the article be the best option?
Not sure if I missed any, but here's several I've found:
- 2603:6011:7045:A300:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - currently under 1 year block since September 23, 2024
- 2603:6011:75F0:1570:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - currently under 6 month block since February 21, 2025
- 2603:6011:75F0:8F0:0:0:0:1D46 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - had 31 hour block on May 21, 2025
- 2603:6011:7500:7136:24DF:EC27:7DFC:C083 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - had 31 hour block on June 6, 2025, then changed to remove talk page access, and then blocked for 31 hours at the /64 range as well
- 2603:6011:75F0:8DA0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - most recent IP/range that you blocked, also had to have talk page access removed
Seems like this is just going to continue going on, so if there's no range(s) that can cover them all, I'm guessing a page protection for a good amount of time would be the best option. Magitroopa (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Magitroopa there seem to be too many constructive edits on the various ranges I looked at (/36, /40, /48). I think page protection is best. I'll do that now. Thanks for reporting! EvergreenFir (talk) 18:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
IP hopper from Tasmania, Australia (according to Geolocate) is at it again over at Bye Bye Nerdie making an unexplained change in the plot. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)