User talk:GerardSpel

June 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Slovenia, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 02:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slovenia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 03:02, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jingiby,

Thank you for your message. I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia’s standards and policies. I believe my recent edits to the Slovenia article were made in good faith, and my intention was to improve the accuracy and clarity of the content, particularly regarding regional classification.

If my edits were perceived as disruptive, that was certainly not my intention. I’m happy to discuss the matter on the article’s talk page and work toward consensus. Please feel free to point out any specific issues or concerns with my edits so we can address them constructively. GerardSpel (talk) 11:31, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]