Jump to content

User talk:Italianboy931

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding your edits to Internet:

[edit]

Your recent edit to Internet (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 01:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Internet, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gscshoyru 01:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Internet. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Internet was changed by Italianboy931 (c) (t) score equals -2140 on 2007-09-12T21:17:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 01:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Jamie peel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste 03:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Yu-Gi-Oh!, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 04:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Yu-Gi-Oh!:

[edit]

Your recent edit to Yu-Gi-Oh! (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 04:09, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Pairadox 04:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. –RHolton04:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]