User talk:Jaspreetsingh678
Jaspreetsingh678 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I want to be unblocked and would like to edit cricket and other sports-related topics only, and not history-related topics anymore, in which I am not very good and mostly messed up. I have worked on sports-related articles before, I have a lot of experience, and there are not many copyright issues in them, like close paraphrasing and please, I request leniency in the standard of the offer, since it's not my fault that PhilKnight confirmed multiple accounts as my sockpuppet without checking properly. I tried to clear it through UTRS as well, but the admins ignored it, Regarding my old accounts, I don't have access to them since I didn't mention my original Gmail to them, unlike this account and I will also suggest a topic bann on myself from history and Sikh related
Decline reason:
No chance of an unblock while you continue demonstrating you haven't the slightest intention of abiding by our policies. You'd be extremely lucky to be unbanned if you go the full six months with zero further evasion, given your demonstrated chronic abuse. Yamla (talk) 12:32, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Jaspreetsingh678 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yamla I was taking a standard offer properly. It's because you admins messed up that I have evasion. [1] [2] [3] At least check the whole case before making a decision. You guys really have no obligation even though you are the ones wrong. As of now, I know I made block evasion in the past, but mentioning or confirming unrelated accounts as my sockpuppet—do you think it's right? And what about Philknight and Spicy? No action against them? Mistakes can happen one time, two times, but not multiple times. I am ready to accept Standard's offer again. But what is the guarantee that this won't happen again? And seriously, one more false complaint by UtherSRG [4]. Do all admins have some personal grudge against me? At least check Yasin1747's talk page [5] the ones who started all of this are ProtobowlAddict and TheTechnician27, without any solid proof. Check the 'What's Going On Here' [6], And I am not the only one whose deleted article Yasin1747 recreated. For example, Abdus Samad's expedition against Jats [7] which was created by User:Mr.Hanes and ZARO2757 also not my sockpuppet please check again he was clearly pro Afghan and Muslim unlike me atleast use some common sense and this is proof [8] [9] [10] check his edits and compare with mine [11] [12]
Decline reason:
You are essentially saying "I robbed a bank, but I didn't rob that one, so I should be set free." What specific account you evaded your block with is less important than the mere fact that you evaded your block at all. 331dot (talk) 11:27, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
331dot, at least try to understand what I meant. I will accept the standard offer and will not make any further requests, but can you please recheck the account that was falsely mentioned as my sockpuppet? Action should also be taken against PhilKnight. If I was wrong, then he is not right either. What should I do when admins ignored my UTRs where I tried to explain that those accounts were not mine? ad3d2f8ae5d81ff19476dba3f95c6c2e567c1353ac5aa754f331f404cf66f601477d00486017f5ed48c07693beac60dd016ecbc579d33b97bc9d9ba2b0952314 You forced me to take this kind of action, so there should be some responsibility taken. The account ZARO2757 is clearly not my sockpuppet, yet PhilKnight confirmed it without proper checking. Only God knows how many other accounts he has falsely confirmed as sockpuppets.Jaspreetsingh678 (talk)
- WP:SO requires six months of zero edits. Please start now. --Yamla (talk) 12:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)