User talk:Shank$ter

March 2025

Hi Shank$ter! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Tornado outbreak of March 13–16, 2025 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Tornado outbreak of March 13–16, 2025, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm Departure–. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page 2024 Greenfield tornado have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. The information was also further down in the article, and your claims were unsourced. You can use a named reference to repeat sources without typing them again manually. Thank you. Departure– (talk) 15:05, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]