User talk:Valfontis
|
||||
Hey Valfontis!
Well said...well said, indeed - [1]
Big fan of your Oregon work. Me and my husband read some of your work when we came back from a Central Oregon road trip last year, helping us fill in a bunch we didn't know. Just great efforts on your part.
Hope your able to save more articles during this GNIS cleanup task. It's been draining in my area of interest...
All the best!
OlympiaBuebird (talk) 18:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! My condolences about Ruth! It's good to know someone is reading my gentle screeds, even if the intended targets don't seem to be! (Or are getting scared off, alas.) I just ordered four railroad books and plan to get my revenge that way, by writing in as much detail as possible about the stations in an article about the line. I don't think redirecting station names to the line they were on will upset too many people. Globe, Oregon will rise again!
- I was just in Central Oregon and am hoping to add to the knowledge bank after I back up my original research with some...research.
- I lived in Olympia for a bit and had a project at TESC that involved Yelm and McKenna (glad to see it's still there). And I think I have some shirttail relations in Chehalis.
- I don't usually wade into policy discussions but I'm wondering how hard it would be to work on improving WP:GEOLAND after the GNIS backlash dies down. (I swear there was a GNIS entry with a circular reference to something I wrote on Wikipedia, so I'm not too surprised it was deemed unreliable.)
- I guess because WP:USEFUL, WP:NEGLECT, WP:HURT, WP:EVERYTHING and a bunch of other inadmissible arguments, I just don't get why we can't host a well-sourced short article on a tiny place name that appears on a map, that PEOPLE MIGHT WANT TO KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT! /rant
- Thank you for your well-researched work on Washington places! Valfontis (talk) 17:23, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
I added a source to the 1921 date you posted for the Jantzen Beach Carousel line item in the Amusement rides on the National Register of Historic Places article, as well as its upcoming future home in The Dalles, Oregon. Typically, Wikipedia frowns on posting things planned to happen in the future, but tons of reliable sources say it's going to happen, so no worries this time. Also, I have this article in an ongoing featured list review here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Amusement rides on the National Register of Historic Places/archive1, so keep an eye out for that. Jackdude101 talk cont 23:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yep, I'm not worried. The "as of" construction is handy for that. It gets ahead of drive-by editors who see stuff in the news and add things that say "currently", which is really frowned on. Thanks for the citations! Valfontis (talk) 01:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Opinion: Crawlers, hogs and gorillas
- Debriefing: Giraffer's RfA debriefing
- Obituary: RHaworth, TomCat4680 and PawełMM
- Traffic report: Heigh-Ho, Heigh-Ho, off to report we go...
- News from Diff: Strengthening Wikipedia’s neutral point of view
- Comix: Thirteen
Hi Valfontis,
I came across this edit while gnoming for broken archiver configurations. The |archive= is missing a valid value, and even the config template itself seems truncated. But instead, the edit added a large block of material, including comments signed by other editors. I can easily fix the archiving, but I have no idea what the intent or cause was of the other content change. DMacks (talk) 03:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
- I just went ahead and fixed it by brute force because apparently I can't follow directions. Thanks for the heads up. P.S. If you look at the revisions vs. the diffs, you'll see nothing actually changed except my hamfisted attempt to add the archiving code and I did not in fact add comments signed by other editors--those were the talk page comments that were already there. I'm not sure what's up with that. Anyway, hopefully it's fixed now. Valfontis (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello Valfontis. I was looking at AfC submissions, and I came across Draft:Siege of Jerusalem (1967). On the draft's talk page, Selfstudier said that the draft appears to be a recreation of Liberation of Jerusalem (1967). I'd like to have a copy of that article so that I can verify whether or not this draft is a recreation. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 10:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not going to provide a copy, but I can verify that the lede has been expanded (and substantial bias introduced) from the deleted article, and the infobox, Background, and Legacy sections are essentially the same. As are the lengthy footnotes. The other sections are new. I'm not sure why you didn't take @Selfstudier:'s word for it, as they're the one who tagged it for speedy deletion. The article was deleted because the author wasn't "extended confirmed", which is a requirement for editing and article creation in this topic area See: Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. The same author recreated the article on January 4, 2025 (although it had existed as a draft since November 22, 2024), after it was deleted on December 30, 2024. Since @Pppery: was the one who deleted it, you might check in with them to see if the article is still subject to the restriction and/or is gaming the system. However, the simplest answer is: I just checked and the author is still not WP:XC, so the article can't be (re)created in any case, even if it was ready for prime time (which it isn't). It sounds like the draft might need to be speedied as well. And since this isn't my topic area, as a courtesy (just as article undeletion is a courtesy), if there is any extended conversation about this, it should go on the draft's talk page or one of your talk pages. I hope that helps! Valfontis (talk) 11:12, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response. I've declined the draft and nominated it for speedy deletion. (Also, I didn't take Selfstudier's word because I didn't look to see if they had tagged the article.) Opm581 (talk | he/him) 11:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status
- Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom
- Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions
- Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man
- Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media
- News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan
- Comix: By territory
- Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia
- Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).
Administrator changes
Rusalkii
NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, administrator elections were permanently authorized on a five-month schedule. The next election will be scheduled soon; see Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections for more information. This is an alternate process to the RfA process and does not replace the latter.
- An RfC was closed with consensus to allow editors to opt-out of seeing "sticky decorative elements". Such elements should now be wrapped in {{sticky decoration wrapper}}. Editors who wish to opt out can follow the instructions at WP:STICKYDECO.
- An RfC has resulted in a broad prohibition on the use of AI-generated images in articles. A few common-sense exceptions are recognized.
Miscellaneous
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
Issue 68, March–April 2025
In this issue we highlight two resource renewals, #EveryBookItsReader, a note about Phabricator, and, as always, a roundup of news and community items related to libraries and digital knowledge.
Read the full newsletterSent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:18, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- In the media: Wikimedia Foundation sues over UK government decision that might require identity verification of editors worldwide
- Disinformation report: What does Jay-Z know about Wikipedia?
- Technology report: WMF introduces unique but privacy-preserving browser cookie
- Debriefing: Goldsztajn's RfA debriefing
- Obituary: Max Lum (User:ICOHBuzz)
- Community view: A Deep Dive Into Wikimedia (part 2)
- Comix: Collection
- From the archives: Humor from the Archives
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.
Technical news
- A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
- History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.
Arbitration
- An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!