User talk:Wikipedian339

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Wikipedian339, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 01:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darien Sutton (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Josve05a were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject's notability is not clearly established with significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. The article relies heavily on primary sources and mentions from media appearances, which may not sufficiently demonstrate notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. Some references are weak or non-independent, such as social media and primary sources. More independent, reliable secondary sources are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Darien Sutton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Concern regarding Draft:Darien Sutton

Hello, Wikipedian339. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Darien Sutton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Wikipedian339. Thank you for your work on Crime Victims Treatment Center. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page about a rape crisis centre - one with a significant history and coming up to 50 years! It's appropriately referenced and clear.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:17, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain thank you SO much for your comment! This really made my day that you left such a positive comment. I'm sure you're already in the habit of this, but I just want to say please keep leaving editors positive messages like this; it means a lot! :) Wikipedian339 (talk) 12:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Greatest Ever

Hello, Wikipedian339,

Thank you for creating Greatest Ever.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There do not appear to be any independent sources that discuss this series in any depth. All source seem to be promotional, or indexes to the show. Are there any independent critics that wrote reviews of the series?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 01:54, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greatest Ever moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Greatest Ever. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:55, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]