Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenSIS

OpenSIS

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. The article seems an advertise. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 12:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Software. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 12:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very PROMO (with the large number of screenshots)... I've done a search, there is nothing about this "portal" (I'm not sure what it is) to be found Brief mention here [1] in a list of similar software. Gsearch brings up primary sources, then social media... Nothing we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 13:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete: Agreed with User:Oaktree b in toto. Not only is this blatantly WP:PROMO, it's badly written promo without any attempt to hide that it's promo. Also seems to fail WP:NOTE even excluding the promo issues. The only sources I can find are two in the first several pages of results that aren't themselves clearly promotional in nature, and neither of those are particularly high quality, or aid in notability. Foxtrot620 (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per all of the above. When I read this promo page aloud, I hear Charlie Brown's teacher speaking. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 17:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This article seems to violate WP:NOTPROMO. Above comments and an inspection of the article indicates multiple issues: no references, not correctly structured, written like an advert. Unfortunately this article has no reasons for being kept. 11WB (talk) 23:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:AfD comment|1= Thank you for the feedback. I understand the concerns and will work to improve the article in line with Wikipedia’s content and notability guidelines. The goal is to provide an informative, neutral, and well-sourced entry on openSIS. I’ll revise the content and add independent, reliable sources to address the issues raised.

Kindly allow me some time to make these changes. Appreciate your consideration. Sarika os4ed (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2025 (UTC) }}[reply]

If the article can be improved within the time this AfD is open, I would be happy to change my vote. I believe this article will be due for potential closure after July 2. 11WB (talk) 12:54, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]