Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheToolX
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TheToolX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. haj • talk 11:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Websites. haj • talk 11:06, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- can u please let me know the reason for deleting this page. Helio112 (talk) 11:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: sources seem to be largely self published, UGC or press releases. Article reads as promotional and there isn't any claim to notability. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 11:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per DandelionAndBurdock's assessment; article is promotional and subject fails GNG. MidnightMayhem 12:25, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: This was just published 17 minutes ago -theinscribermag.com/how-thetoolx-com-became-a-viral-platform-for-online-tools-everyone-can-use/, unsigned/staff writer and reads like a promo regardless and it's blocked by the spam filter here. I don't see any coverage we can use to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and promotional. Madeleine (talk) 17:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Zero reliable third-party sources. I became aware of this AfD because of the blacklist hits; relying heavily on blacklisted PR sites is usually a strong sign that a topic is not notable.OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)