Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTTP

UTTP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notorious online troll group known for doing a lot of bad stuff that I will not explain here. Still, I don't think it's notable enough for it's own WP page. An editor from Mars (talk) 07:32, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No coverage by any reliable sources. Celjski Grad (talk) 08:18, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:51, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But I did add References so why is it not notable AyaanJaved (talk) 10:13, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of those references are reliable sources. Celjski Grad (talk) 10:59, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find any sigcov at all and existing references are all entirely user-generated without defining notability. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 11:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy delete and salt (in article and draft space)~~ This is a literal copy-and-paste from Google AI mode, and the only 'notorious' thing this group has done is spam comment sections and wikis (Fandom and here) with pointless fighting over kid things. Also assuming this was forced through since we've probably locked the full title and variations several times over, so this needs salting. Nathannah • 📮 12:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I heard the group spammed dead animals and children on Discord. An editor from Mars (talk) 05:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Anybody can name themselves anything they want on Discord and that is definitely not notable or sourcable in the least. We only consider reliable sources, with veracity on the open web. Nathannah • 📮 21:11, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There's some sort of political/group/organization in Indonesia that shares this abbreviation, but it's not related to this. I don't see any sourcing about an online group with this name. Sourcing now in the article is... just sad. Reddit, Wiktionary and Urban Dictionary? These are not RS. Oaktree b (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that @Oaktree b:; I would support a delete/locked redirect to Ministry of Trade (Indonesia), which contains that political department (UTTP is a department there that supports metrology). Nathannah • 📮 22:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the subject lacks coverage by WP:RS.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i will try and find WP:RS. Jdn2004 (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG, lacks any reliable sources. Dan arndt (talk) 06:20, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.: this is a small group of individuals trolling on Youtube, which really doesn't necessitate its own page. In addition, this page was written by AI as proven by other voters. Wickedfandude (talk) 01:28, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article lacks coverage by reliable sources and doesn't meet WP:GNG. Furthermore, it appears to be fully AI-generated. 193.5.232.61 (talk) 16:23, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How can you proje its AI generated?

Simple - You cant. Jdn2004 (talk) 10:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to ZeroGPT, 87% of the article is generated by AI, while Scribblr, GPTZero, and QuillBot score it at 100%. Celjski Grad (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I literally said above that it's word-for-word a copy of what Google's AI mode generates. It is a full-on copyright violation endorsed by an LLM. 13:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC) Nathannah • 📮 13:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Completely fails GNG, no verifiable evidence of notability, should have never been moved out of draftspace — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 23:06, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is just a small, relatively obscure group of trolls, and spam bots. Other than posting spam comments on certain videos, there's nothing noteworthy. Rickraptor707 (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]