Wikipedia:Editor review/ACBest

ACBest

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

ACBest (talk · contribs) Hi there! Im Damon, and i dont think im 'up to spec', so i was hoping i could get told, like how i am doing - am i doing well, can i do better, if so what? e.t.c Thanks! ACBest Dog and Bone 18:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Review from Jonathan

Hello. I have a few suggestions for you:

Bring your edit summary usage up to 100%
Make more edits in the article namespace, and fewer in the user NS. (I have this problem a little, too. :D)
I recommend you try working in some administrator-related areas, such as UAA, deletion discussions, and AIV.

Other than that, your edits are perfect! Bye! —Jonathan | Quality, not quantity. 00:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please change your signature, it is terribly bright (or at least for my browser). I think you do some good work on train related articles, but I also recommend you refrain from editing your userpage as much (history). Thanks, —Qst 18:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review from James (Britishrailclass91 (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)) I think that you are a good user who believes in up-to-spec articles I don't know why you put yourself up for editor review, you're fine as it is. I have also deleted my comments about your signature, good luck! Britishrailclass91 (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I won't go as far as demanding that you change it but would suggest that your signature is perhaps unnecessarily long, both when viewed on a page and in Wiki markup code. Please consider whether you really need "Have I reverted an edit by you, and got it wrong? Tell me!" in your signature. I would suggest not. I consider the default signature to be perfectly acceptable, has everything I'd find useful in someone's signature, and doesn't take up loads of space. Regards. Adambro (talk) 15:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From what I have seen, this user is very competent and I can see nothing wrong with him. Kelladam96 (talk) 15:17, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
No, not really.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
IPVandals cause me the most stress, but no other users

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.