Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Assessment

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
100pt WikiProject

Food and Drink
Shortcut

 Assessment

HomeTalk pageMembersOpen tasksAssessmentShowcaseToolsTemplatesStub templatesNewsletters
Food & Drink WikiProject
Index · Statistics · Log
Food and drink articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 15 32 54
FL 2 10 12
FM 147 147
GA 19 34 84 304 441
B 55 229 350 749 100 1,483
C 73 413 1,031 3,777 580 5,874
Start 24 323 1,681 12,561 4,071 18,660
Stub 17 515 9,030 5,054 14,616
List 12 71 115 556 22 284 1,060
Category 9,889 9,889
Disambig 223 223
File 3,011 3,011
Portal 811 811
Project 442 442
Redirect 10 73 657 2,948 3,688
Template 1,080 1,080
NA 2 2
Other 3 239 242
Assessed 183 1,106 3,864 27,679 18,814 10,089 61,735
Unassessed 28 1,662 1,690
Total 183 1,106 3,864 27,707 18,814 11,751 63,425
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 209,823 Ω = 5.10

Welcome to the assessment department of the Food and drink WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Food and drink related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Food and drink articles by quality and Category:Food and drink articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions

[edit]
How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Food and drink WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Taskforce Quality Statistics

[edit]
Taskforce Quality Statistics

Cheeses Taskforce Desserts Taskforce
Index · Statistics · Log Index · Statistics · Log
Cheeses articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
GA 2 1 3
B 1 1 2 6 10
C 1 5 15 27 4 52
Start 1 11 42 131 46 231
Stub 17 172 105 294
List 1 5 1 7 2 16
Category 111 111
Disambig 5 5
File 1 1
Portal 1 1
Project 10 10
Redirect 1 7 29 37
Template 19 19
Assessed 4 22 80 351 176 157 790
Unassessed 1 1
Total 4 22 80 351 176 158 791
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 3,163 Ω = 5.36
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Desserts articles by quality statistics
Foodservice Taskforce Herbs and Spices Taskforce
Index · Statistics · Log Index · Statistics · Log
Foodservice articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 4 4
FL 3 3
GA 3 14 109 126
B 3 16 30 73 5 127
C 4 27 120 330 31 512
Start 2 28 145 1,564 381 2,120
Stub 40 1,208 369 1,617
List 7 5 34 5 5 56
Category 1,251 1,251
Disambig 5 5
File 148 148
Portal 1 1
Project 13 13
Redirect 4 47 120 171
Template 89 89
Other 1 2 3
Assessed 9 81 358 3,373 1,634 791 6,246
Unassessed 63 63
Total 9 81 358 3,373 1,634 854 6,309
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 22,983 Ω = 5.10
Herbs and Spices pages by quality
Quality
Total
Assessed 0
Total 0

Instructions

[edit]

Quality assessments

[edit]

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the |class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds them to the FA-Class Food and drink articles category)  FA
FL (for featured lists only; adds them to the FL-Class Food and drink articles category)  FL
A (for articles that passed a formal peer review only; adds them to the A-Class Food and drink articles category)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds them to the GA-Class Food and drink articles category)  GA
B (for articles that satisfy all of the B-Class criteria; adds them to the B-Class Food and drink articles category) B
C (for substantial articles; adds them to the C-Class Food and drink articles category) C
Start (for developing articles; adds them to the Start-Class Food and drink articles category) Start
Stub (for basic articles; adds them to the Stub-Class Food and drink articles category) Stub
List (for stand-alone lists; adds them to the List-Class Food and drink articles category) List
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to the NA-Class Food and drink pages category) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in the Unassessed Food and drink articles category) ???
For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:
FM (for featured media only; adds them to the FM-Class Food and drink pages category)  FM
Category (for categories; adds them to the Category-Class Food and drink pages category) Category
Draft (for drafts; adds them to the Draft-Class Food and drink pages category) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds them to the File-Class Food and drink pages category) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds them to the Portal-Class Food and drink pages category) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds them to the Project-Class Food and drink pages category) Project
Template (for templates and modules; adds them to the Template-Class Food and drink pages category) Template
The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds them to the Disambig-Class Food and drink pages category) Disambig
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds them to the Redirect-Class Food and drink pages category) Redirect

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

[edit]
WikiProject content quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Maraba coffee
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of vegetable oils
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Burger King
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;[1] and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Fish
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Vanilla
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. 2000 St. James Place
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon. Kashi (company)
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Abobra
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of fast food restaurants
Category Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:Food and Category:Drink
Disambig Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. BK (disambiguation)
File Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited.
Portal Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. Food and Drink
Project All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. This one
Redirect Any redirect falls under this class. The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. Wikipedia:5P
Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. {{WikiProject Food and drink}}
NA Any non-article page that fits no other classification. The page contains no article content. Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. Talk:Burger_King/sandbox

B-Class criteria

[edit]

Special emphasis is given to the six criteria that B-Class articles for the WikiProject should meet:

B
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.


Importance assessments

[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Food and drink articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Food and drink articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Food and drink articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Food and drink articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Food and drink articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Food and drink articles)  ??? 

Importance scale

[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to culinary students.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

WikiProject article importance scheme
Importance Criteria Example
 Top Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. Food, Drink
 High Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. McDonald's
 Mid Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. Grilled cheese sandwich
 Low Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. Monkey bread
 NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. Category:Foods, Category:Beverages

Requesting an assessment

[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessment log

[edit]
Food and drink articles:
Index · Statistics · Log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Assessment log

June 13, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
  • Antipasto (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Areesh cheese (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Arroz junto (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Arròs a banda (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Asanka (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ballotin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Balık çorbası (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Bar Facal (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Barbarella's (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Barry Benepe (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Bartaco (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Bear River Winery (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Belt Publishing (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ben Frank's (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Besana Group (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Bespoke BBQ Company (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Beuschel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Beverage opener (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Big Cheese Festival (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Birdie's (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Black Beer Festival (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Brauerei Fohrenburg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Braulio (liqueur) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Bread fork (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Brenntar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Butterfield Market (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Bánh giò (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • CHAR No.4 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cask'n Flagon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cebon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cellier des Dauphins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Chalosse (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cheap Eats (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cheers Wines (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Chef2chef (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Chefography (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cherikee Red (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Coconut flower nectar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cofresh (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cognac Gautier (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cola Turka (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Colleiteiro (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Comedy Works (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cuisine of Pará (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cully & Sully (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Curing (vegetable preservation) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Cémoi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Danbing (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Daregal (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • DaveCo Liquor Store (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • De Halve Maan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Deer blood (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Diāng-biĕng-gù (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Dog-Gone Sauce (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Dough sheeting (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Earls (restaurant chain) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Earth's Best (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Fair Play AVA (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Fish protein powder (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Fred Baur (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Gontran Cherrier (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Jokpyeon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Jumeok-bap (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Kway chap (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Mildred Lager (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Miriam Birdseye (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • New Haven-style pizza (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
  • Nutritional biodiversity (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Poke (dish) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
  • Popeseye steak (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Porringer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Potentially Hazardous Food (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Poussin (chicken) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Raspberry vinegar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Relleno negro (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Remoska (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Renegade Monk (cheese) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Reshmi kabab (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Rheology of peanut butter (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ribfest (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ribollita (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Rice hull (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Richard Bertinet (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ricicles (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Saftsuppe (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Sauce gribiche (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Sayadiya (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Sbitenshchik (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Scho-Ka-Kola (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Tavern-style pizza (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Yufka (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Disambig-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

[edit]

June 12, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

June 11, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
  • CDO Foodsphere (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Dressed herring (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Drink carrier (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Egg wash (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Eggs Beauregard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Eka soup (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Figolla (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Filled pasta (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Finger steaks (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Fire & Flavor (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Flanby (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Flocafé (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Food challenge (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Frittella (doughnut) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Frulact (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Graham bread (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Hanwoo (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Haugh unit (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Kegerator (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Kekefia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Kericho Gold (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • King Phojanakong (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Koftet el hati (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Krumiri (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Kutluma (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Lingonberry juice (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Magenbrot (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Malewa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Malt whisky (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Metworst (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Micromarket (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Milling yield (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Mint (candy) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Mt. Harlan AVA (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Mujdei (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Noodle latkes (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Now and Later (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • NumBrands (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Nutmeg oil (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • NutraSweet (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Nutrient profiling (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Orijin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Osmania biscuit (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Otong soup (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Palace Grocery (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Pallini Limoncello (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Pallone di Gravina (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Panda tea (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Paneer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
  • Panone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Papagaio (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Philosophy of eating (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
  • Phytosanitary irradiation (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Pichelsteiner (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Potée (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Purity Factories (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Salumi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
  • Sandora (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

June 10, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

June 9, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
  • Ginger ale (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
  • Gu Lao Rou (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
  • Jalfrezi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ji Jong Hwo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Michael James Snyder (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ricotta (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
  • Whey protein (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

June 8, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
  • Edith H. Nason (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Mala hotpot (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

June 7, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
  • Cerro Pelon Ranch (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • French dip (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
  • Gefillde (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
  • Sheet pizza (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
  • Yupʼik cuisine (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]
  1. ^ Prose at the Good Article level is not expected to be at a professional level like it is for Featured Articles. Minor grammatical or style issues that do not impact clarity are not prohibitive of GA status.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Food_and_drink/Assessment&oldid=1285376581"