Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Holmes.sherlock
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (talk page) (0/3/0); Ended 04:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Closed early by Chaser, because this is not a serious RFA, as the nominee has indicated on his user page and user talk page that he "will be away forever due to leukemia, a sickness and he may die." Let's not waste our time.--Chaser - T 03:49, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
holmes.sherlock (talk · contribs) - {{{Description}}}
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
[edit]- See holmes.sherlock's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
- Links for holmes.sherlock: Holmes.sherlock (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/holmes.sherlock before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]Support
Oppose
You're clearly not ready. Numerous people have told you that.--Chaser - T 02:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose and I'm seriously not trying to be funny, however this edit doesn't help much... -WarthogDemon 03:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose RfA is not a joke, nor is a light-hearted commitment, even though it isn't a big deal. I seriously recommend that you withdraw your RfA, and continue to edit Wikipedia constructively. Until you are nominated, or feel very confident about another RfA, please don't apply. Elenseel 03:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose agree with the above. Miranda 03:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.