Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mrmattkatt

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Mrmattkatt

(0/3/0) ending 03:55 [9/15/05 9/23/05] (UTC)

Mrmattkatt (talk · contribs) – Mrmattkatt has been on here for a while and he has been going around and being helpful sometimes under his own user name sometimes under his i.p address. He had helped around and edited articles that he wanted to edit. He is a very helpfull user and that's why i nominate him. User:Redsportscar 19:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I accept the nomination:

Support

Oppose

Kate's tool counts five edits in three destinct pages (1 article, 2 user, and 2 user talk edits) — this might be because the first edit was made September 14, 2005! Please come again in 3-4 months when you have atleast 1500 edits in atleast 10 different namespaces.
Journalist ^C./ ^{Holla @ me!}
Oppose. I was a bit confused by the 5 edits also. Friday (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and this should be removed. The original nominator was an anom and now is a user with Zero edits. Also, the nominee has 6 edits now and apparently has not been here for awhile, at least not under this username. So the nomination is based on a lie. The intent is to scam. Terry ^{T | @ | C} 20:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)

A.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A.

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.