User talk:Shvrs: Difference between revisions

Shvrs, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Shvrs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Raju, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:30, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

I have witten it in talk page & i have no need to discuss it with you,it is as simple as "the enquiry of any theft can't be done by the thief who had done it".Similarly, you are a culprit and doing mischief in Rajus article,so why to waste the time in discussing with you.And i know what to do.Thank you -Shvrs (talk) 09:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Raju. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 10:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an accurate edit summary with every edit. Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You have made several edit summaries where you state that you add information when you instead delete content. Thanks! Sjö (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

30 March 2014

Hello, I'm Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yadav because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You cannot alter the wording of a quotation from a reliable source. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Shvrs, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Agnivansha has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your addition to Raju has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you continue to add copyvio you will be blocked - you were warned before you added this again to Raju after I removed it (although I hadn't noticed it was copyvio at the time, you knew it was). Dougweller (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Mr.Dougweller,you were mistaken Rajus material was not copied from that yuva kshatriyas blog.These gotras and other things are explained in books written by k.S.Singh i.e "India's communities" & "People of India".See links: http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=8jg5U4uiJ4PyrQfgpYG4Dg&id=P3LiAAAAMAAJ&dq=people+of+india+tamil+nadu&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=pasupati & http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=KDk5U9-uOoS_rgeu_oCYAg&id=1lZuAAAAMAAJ&dq=india%27s+communities&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Raju

I have written from those.Thank You -Shvrs (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

I have written Agnivanshi material from blog but not Rajus.I hope you understand.Thank YOU -Shvrs (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Ok, I'll strike through the 2nd warning. Dougweller (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions relating to castes

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Dougweller (talk) 09:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

You are doing it again, despite someone else also reverting you. What bit of WP:CONSENSUS do you not understand? - Sitush (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

What is your problem,please clearly say ? -Shvrs (talk) 10:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Can you say that Government of Andhra Pradesh don't mention Rajus as Kshatriyas in its caste list thats what is mentioned in srinivasulu and stated in 1.2%.Then why iam wrong and i have provided sources.- Shvrs (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit-warring is likely to get you blocked, especially given the discretionary sanctions that apply. Get agreement on the talk page. Dougweller (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

i have explained to you & also the users are creating problems to version by reverting,that they are not understanding -Shvrs (talk) 11:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Your recent editing history at Raju shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)