Jump to content

User:Doug Weller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Dougweller)
User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
home
Talk Page
Workshop
Site Map
Userboxes
Edits
Email


IP Rangeblock Calculator IP Range Edit Check Checkusers Oversighters

User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI

User:Spicy/SPI admin guide

Noticeboards
Administrators' noticeboard (30 threads)
Administrators' noticeboard: Incidents (60 threads)
Administrative action review (2 threads)
Edit warring noticeboard (8 threads)
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (0 threads)
Most recent:
Bots noticeboard (1 thread)
Most recent:
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads)
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (9 threads)
BLP noticeboard (16 threads)
Fringe theories noticeboard (20 threads)
Original research noticeboard (8 threads)
Reliable sources noticeboard (16 threads)
Neutral point of view noticeboard (21 threads)
External links noticeboard (8 threads)
Conflict of interest noticeboard (15 threads)
Dispute resolution noticeboard (13 threads)
Help desk (50 threads)
Media copyright questions (7 threads)
Teahouse (44 threads)
Village Pump (policy) (10 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (24 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (5 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (16 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (9 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (7 threads)

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 119
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 68
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 13
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 15
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 178
Requested RD1 redactions 3
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 2
Candidates for speedy deletion 15
Open sockpuppet investigations 67
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 2
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 5
Other candidates 11
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 180 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. HolyArtThou (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Syrian flags

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One editor who stopped after three reverts yesterday. Rereport if they resume. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Rationalist community

Reason: An administrator of a website associated with this community (LessWrong) posted about the article on the website, calling some passages "inane", accusing editors of editing despite being topic banned, and encouraged his followers to edit the article (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/EQJfdqSaMcJyR5k73/#bfzEHGiiNtnRerujL). Since then the article has seen several SPAs show up making disruptive edits that need to be reverted, wasting editors' time. Some diffs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1297131380&oldid=1297113741 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1297056458&oldid=1297033565 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1296762013&oldid=1296528241 Eigenbra (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There isn't a lot of reverting going on, not compared to other articles that usually get reported here, and vigorous discussion on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Houthi-controlled territory of Yemen

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP editor who seems to have stopped reverting after a discussion on his talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Blackpool F.C.

Reason: History of the team with a fa cup 74.12.181.3 (talk) 19:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
    Declined First, request does not give reason protection is needed. Second, this edit should not have been reverted since it removed uncited information. I'm not going to protect a page so some extended-confirmed editor can violate our sourcing policies to their heart's content. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Olympique Lyonnais

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors. QalasQalas (talk) 22:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Undefined

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and block evasion by LTA who games permissions by spam editing in their sandbox to bypass the extended confirmed protection level already in effect. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 04:04, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Blockercu (talk · contribs) blocked by Lofty abyss. indef and globally locked as well. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

List of Animaniacs episodes

Full protection: Edit-warring / content dispute. Left guide (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Democratic-Republican Party

Request Semi-Protection IP editor repeatedly engaging in original research and violating WP:3RR. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 10:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Also worth bringing up that the IP editor has attempted to reinstate their edit several times in the last 20 days, all of which were challenged, and called upon a fictitious talk page consensus in one of their summaries. – GlowstoneUnknown (Talk) 10:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree that, at least, they don't realize that simply having a source doesn't mean their text wasn't original research. See if they might respond to having other people in the talk page discussion. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Ali al-Sistani

Reason: Relentless reverting, sockpuppets removing reliable sources, edit warring Montblamc1 (talk) 12:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/IRP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Template:2024–25 Ligue 1 table

Reason: High level of incorrect informations and edits about hypothetic scenarios about Lyon's situation instead of official news Lâm (talk) 12:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Ironheart (miniseries)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts from IPs to change the reception of this series. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 15:40, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. After the last burst about 36 hours or so ago, it looks like cooler heads have prevailed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Thomas C. Fugate

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism -- Pemilligan (talk) 15:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

2025 in British television

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IPs adding unsourced content (Special:Contributions/82.28.254.28, Special:Contributions/2A02:C7E:66C2:F400:B1FA:A766:20D1:E5A4). Andreworkney (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Both IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 21:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Shark

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2601:486:100:DCA0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Discospinster. Pending changes can cope with a single /64 in a week. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Baby oil

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pending changes can cope with two instances in June. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Casualties of the Iran–Israel war

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Thepharoah17 (talk) 18:05, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Frederick the Great

Semi-protection. Reason: Disruption is low frequency but constant across the years. Users, almost always unregistered change the same sentence about Frederick the Great's sexuality. This recent example, linked here is typical. In the latest case, undoing the change escalated into repeated vandalism see this example Current language was worked out during FAN. If it is to be changed, it would have to be done in discussion, which would ideally be done with a registered user. Wtfiv (talk) 18:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

List of people who have died while on the toilet

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi-protection was previously granted for a month under the acknowledgement that something temporary should be tried first even when it's obvious (see, e.g., blue whale penis). Article is once again the subject of vandalism. Not only will this article never not be a magnet for vandalism, but there are two important points: 1) this sort of vandalism is very likely to target living people as a joke, and 2) this article does not have enough eyes on it to curate that in a timely fashion. For example, a recent edit appears to be fabricated; I could find no evidence of this searching Mexican news. This names a municipality of ~480,000 but also gives a full name and age. This went unnoticed for 12 days even as another experienced editor reverted vandalism replacing one case with the name "Bart Simpson", and I can only imagine how long it would've sat if I didn't randomly check my watchlist. I'm exceedingly confident that I could put flagrant libel on here and nobody would notice for at least a month, let alone if I were even somewhat clever about it. As noted in the previous protection request, IP editors and new editors have exclusively done harm to this article, and a large portion of edits were simply vandalism from new editors and IP editors (with no vandalism coming from anyone autoconfirmed). TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 20:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

ro:Partidul SENS

Reason: Political party, gets often vandalised. needs semi-protected status Ispravnic (talk) 20:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Declined, you would need to request protection at the Romanian Wikipedia. We can not do anything here. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... 148.76.242.72 (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Madison De La Garza

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:12, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Template:Anonblock hard

Reason: Only 12 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Is there any reason why the average editor would need to edit this? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Presumably the IP intends to nominate this and the below for deletion based on their other edits. But that doesn't require an unprotection; they can just request that the TfD tag be added using {{edit template-protected}}. However, what makes you think Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}? Do you have any actual evidence of this, or are you just guessing? * Pppery * it has begun... 05:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
quarry:query/94896 shows that it hasn't been used in block logs. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Template:School block hard

Reason: Only 7 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{school block}} 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

According to quarry:query/94896, there is a single block from 2021 that did use it, but I'm not sure that that is a good reason for protection if the block has already expired. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Malbolge

Reason: This was indef-semied via this request by Daniel Case (his talk page is also protected, hence asking here first). This was probably inappropriate; the report said "repeated IP vandalism over the last 6 months", but there were a mere 2 vandalism edits over that time frame, both on the same day by the same IP. I don't see anything here that ever really rose to protection being needed. Thanks in advance. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: I'm going to leave this to you. Perhaps indefinite pending changes would be fine, but I would also be fine with leaving it unchanged. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Novels

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Moxy🍁 12:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
That page is already temporarily semi protected, what do you want it decreased to? — xaosflux Talk 12:42, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Iran–Israel war

The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

  •  On hold: Hello, Pkk123477. Your edit request has been restored here as we need further input on this, as initially requested by Behappyyar. Would you be willing to post the sources that you have so that they can be reviewed and used to update the article? --Super Goku V (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Iran–Israel war

The join date of the US should be changed to 21 June, the strike Bombers took off from the US right after midnight Eastern Daylight Time on 21 June which would be 21 June 07:30 AM Iran time 2603:300B:E4D:8000:F08A:B088:141E:465F (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Iran–Israel war

Add JD Vance and Marco Rubio to american leaders 2600:387:F:560E:0:0:0:2E (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

St. Thomas Orthodox Cathedral, Mulanthuruthy

The title has been blocked to read this when it should be Mulanthuruthy Marthoman Syrian Church. This needs to be fixed. JvathBdan (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@JvathBdan: Start a requested-move discussion on the talk page, making sure to provide sources that can support the name. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Iran–Israel war

The statement that : "9,000+ Israeli civilians displaced" and "8,000+ Israeli civilians homeless" at the bottom of the "Casualties and losses" panel is misinformation by omission. Civilian infrastructure was also destroyed in Iran (example https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/13/shock-fear-in-tehran-after-israel-bombs-residential-military-areas) and I think we should either remove the statement about Israeli civilians, or add one for Iranian civilians in case any estimate exists. Otherwise it makes it sound only Iran targeted civilian infrastructure. Chalchiutlicue (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Gaza war

In the casualties and losses column. There should be civilian losses and casualties specified for Palestine the same as it is for Israel 1.121.196.162 (talk) 05:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

I think the casualties and losses column counts everyone, not just Israelis. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 09:45, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Blocked text (request) 2025-06-21 19:34 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
17 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-06-03 11:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Graph:Chart (request) 2025-06-03 22:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-09-04: "High-risk template or module: 5001 transclusions (more info)"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-06-05 03:06 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Infobox sports season (request) 2025-06-05 23:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Graph (request) 2025-06-11 07:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Mapframe (request) 2025-06-11 13:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fish and karate on 2018-05-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:Post-nominals/CAN (request) 2025-06-15 01:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Medals table (request) 2025-06-18 18:56 Template-protected (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2018-09-23: "Highly visible template"
Template:Uw4im (request) 2025-06-18 20:07 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-19: "Highly visible template"
Template:Uw-delete4im (request) 2025-06-18 20:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2018-06-04: "Highly visible template"
Template:Taxonomy/CAM (request) 2025-06-19 09:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2024-09-01: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Taxonomy/Polysporangiophytes (request) 2025-06-19 15:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by TheSandDoctor on 2021-08-21: "Highly visible template - 79k uses"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-06-20 10:25 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Infobox musical artist (request) 2025-06-22 14:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox tennis tournament year (request) 2025-06-23 18:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Highlight/core (request) 2025-06-23 20:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox organization (request) 2025-06-25 18:55 Template-protected (log) Protected by Wugapodes on 2020-04-12: "Highly visible template: Restore protection after undeletion"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Underbar dk

I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

User:M.Billoo2000

Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

User:GGOTCC

As of writing, I have created more than 50 articles from either redlinks or expanded redirects alongside ~30 templates, with only one superfluous template having been deleted. With a dozen Good Article and DYK citations, I believe I have proven myself in understanding the fomat and style of Wikipedia. My current project, to create articles on US Civil War-era ship classes, has and will quickly add more to the backlog. I have never had any issue with the New Page Patrol (that I recall), and would like to not add to their work as several of my previous articles/templates took months to be marked as reviewed (quite understandable, it's a large backlog!). My newest articles, all created since this weekend, (Mohican-class sloop, Sacramento-class sloop, Algoma-class sloop, and Potomac-class frigate) are well cited and comply with all requirments. Thank you! GGOTCC 02:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

You might want to go back to the Potomac-class frigate article and address the referencing errors that show up, GGOTCC. Schwede66 03:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done Upon a closer look, I see that those errors were introduced by an AWB run by Rich Smith. Schwede66 03:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
@Schwede66: and @GGOTCC:, sorry about that. Basically the cite errors appears as AWB converts 'others' to 'author', which cite book doesn't like as you should either have a first and last name OR an author. There is no need to put 'Internet Archive' there, so I've just removed it which resolved the error. - RichT|C|E-Mail 09:18, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
These things do happen with AWB runs. Stuff like that has happened to me too. It shouldn’t because one should check, but it does. I pinged you to (a) make you aware of it for future runs, and (b) because I thought you might want to go back over those edits. Great to hear that you are applying a fix, Rich Smith. Schwede66 10:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Selbsportrait

Hello, I would like to use the editor mainly to have access to backreferences for editing using regular expressions. My actual use case would be to make a 300-line table sortable by last name. Work with data would also be useful. I also would like to be able to speed up formatting more generally, e.g. italics, quote marks, etc. Selbsportrait (talk) 22:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Pineapple Storage

I'm back again! I previously requested this to help with WP:POSTMOVE for links to Guna language (then withdrew that request), but since then I've realised there are a few areas I could use this tool in, not least for updating non-linked uses of "Kuna" and "Cuna" for Guna language and Guna people (of which there seem to be quite a lot). I might also use it for linking/redlinking new articles (for instance, some of the drafts I'm currently working on), and also to help out with updating some of the 90,000+ articles transcluding (the now-deprecated) Template:EngvarB to other English-variety templates. Obviously there might also be some typo correction etc. as required. Pineapple Storage (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 17:10, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Vira Orlovska

Hi there,

I'd like to request permission to add an English translation of a Wikipedia article I originally created (title: "Ukraine Art Aid Center" - currently available in Ukrainian and German). The article is about the organization I work for. The content has been reviewed and approved by our steering committee. I'm happy to provide any additional confirmations if needed.

Just a bit of background: I hold an MA in linguistics (English and German, Ivan Franko University in Lviv, Ukraine), completed a second MA program in English at a German university, and have over 10 years of experience working in English in areas like international development, cultural heritage, and cultural emergency response.

For the past couple of months, I’ve been trying to find a more experienced Wikipedia editor to help publish the English version of the article, but unfortunately haven’t had any luck. I’d be really grateful for the chance to publish it myself, as it would help raise awareness of our organization and support the important work we’re doing.

Thanks in advance for considering my request. I’m looking forward to your reply.

Warm regards, Vira Orlovska Vira Orlovska (talk) 11:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. You should create the translation in the Draft namespace and submit it for review. You don't need this user group to create a page in the Draft namespace. We don't really care that the content has been approved by your organisation as we're generally not interested in what an organisation has to say about itself - we're interested in summarising what other people have to say about the organisation. You will also need to disclose your connection to the organisation per the instructions on that page to comply with our Terms of Use. stwalkerster (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag.

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Uncle Bash007

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have just completed the NPPS and passed the final exams.[2] I want to contribute actively in reviewing new pages on English Wikipedia. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I found UB's NPP training to be pretty exemplary and I think UB would make a good addition to the NPP team, over all. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you @Vanderwaalforces Uncle Bash007 (talk) 22:17, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Cassiopeia was my trainer for your verification. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 11:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Rahmatula786

I am reapplying for NPP rights. I have been contributing regularly as an AFC reviewer and have done good number of reviews so far. Also contributing in JUNE Backlog Drive. My AFD stats are above 90% accurate. Have improved my understanding since last request. I am aware of and have been doing PROD, CSD and drafting , understanding of which are required for NPP rights . Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 16:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done, last time I pointed out issues with neutrality at Nandan Van Zoo. Rather than incorporating critical coverage into the article, you just cleaned up the formatting. That's not what I had asked you to do, and suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of what neutrality means on Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 17:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Như Gây Mê

Hi, I'm requesting rights be extended after a one month trial. I would like to request permanent NPR rights if possible, as I have greatly enjoyed contributing in this capacity and I am eager to help reduce the backlog. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 00:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 00:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Eliezer1987

I'm a patroller on the Hebrew Wikipedia with extensive experience in content review and Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with English Wikipedia's guidelines and have been actively participating here, including contributing to article creation and quality control processes. I would like to contribute to New Page Patrol, mainly on topics related to Israel, Judaism, and Hungary, and I would be happy to expand my knowledge and activity into additional areas. Eliezer1987 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:MWFwiki

NPR temporary permissions set to expire within a week. Requesting extension or permanent permissions. I have not been as active in the NPR space as I'd like to be, being very busy with the AfC Backlog Drive. Regardless, thank you for your time! MWFwiki (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 21:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Aydoh8

Hi there, my rights expire on the 30th and I would like to request an extension. I did ask a few weeks ago since I know of the perennial backlog here, but got rejected on the basis it was too early. I'm reapplying now since it's a little under a week until that happens. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 23:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Taabii

I was granted reviewer rights for two times, both were temporary. I'm here requesting the right again to review the articles and make the burden less for others too. I was not active like before due to some personal issues, but I'm going to be active now. Please consider extending my rights. Thankyou Taabii (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 17:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Fancy Refrigerator

I am requesting page mover right mainly because it would help me draftify articles (see my draftify log). And secondarily because it would allow me to perform uncontroversial moves in mainspace without leaving being redirects. I have not participated in RMs but I have made moves that show that I understand the guidelines, namely:

And more recently

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Starfall2015

This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5][6]). — MusikBot talk 08:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
This is a request for WP:PCR, not WP:ROLLBACK. Did you apply for the correct permission? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
I did, but I have Twinkle and RedWarn. What really irritates me is that there are often about 10 changes but I can only revert them. Starfall2015 let's talk profile 15:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Justjourney

I think I have enough experience editing and defending Wikipedia against vandalism. I routinely check the recent changes page, and know what vandalism or unexplained removal of content looks like. Therefore, I would like to review pending changes. I have read WP:PCR and understand it. If there is a edit that I'm not sure of, I will simply leave it for another editor to review. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 04:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Chetsford (talk) 05:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:TonySt

Hello! When checking my watchlist of frequently-vandalized articles or patrolling recent changes, I frequently work with articles which have pending changes. When there's obvious vandalism or a BLP issue I can already help out by reverting, but I'm requesting the reviewer role so I can approve any non-bad edit I come across -- ones which I've always had to simply ignore as false positives. I've checked out WP:PC and WP:RPC to familiarize myself with the policies and guidelines around recent changes and the expectations of reviewers. I appreciate your consideration :) — tony 15:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

User:PawPatroler

I may make mistakes, but we all grw from them. The reason why I want to be a pending changes reviewer is so that I can approve edits that are not inline with Wikipedia's rules. I think that, since I'll become extended-confirm soon, it's time to request this permission again. PawPatroler (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7][8]). — MusikBot talk 23:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. This is your third request for PCR inside two weeks. Please slow down, stop requesting permissions, and heed the advice that has been given to you; not least the final warning that was issued to you last week. Giraffer (talk) 23:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Igor123121

Hello! I'm reaching out to request rollback rights so I can tackle vandalism more effectively. I've been actively patrolling recent changes and using Twinkle to revert vandalism, and I'd also like to try using Huggle which requires rollback permissions.

I get that rollback is a fast-paced tool meant for clear cases of vandalism or unconstructive edits, and I'm well-versed in the relevant policies and guidelines.

Thanks for considering my request! Igor123121 (talk) 08:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Criticize

I kindly request for Full Rollback Priviledges I was recently denied because of my poor quality to warn victim editors on their talk pages. I took that as a lesson and have improved on that rapidly quick. (Together with advice from 2 other loyal editors). But Please (Begging you) I really need these priviledges as I have read the advantages favor my abilities to warn editors Accurately Fast compared to The Default manual revert which is really delaying and a struggle. I recently attempted using the Twinkle Tool but it ruins the website's performance on my side (not sure why). Article modifications are coming in with blazing speed almost every milli-second. And the Default Manual Revert slows me down horribly. And victims may succeed in leaving damaged content on articles and other platforms, As Not every vandalism Fighter seems to be always online as much as I am now.

Please grant me the priviledges. It would be a pleasure to protect Wikipedia into being a safe, decent, and clean community. You have my word. I will Never let you down sir/ma'am. Criticize (talk) 09:19, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@Criticize There's no point making a new request, when your previous request was declined so soon. It hasn't even been archived yet! Please wait atleast 2 weeks before making a new request. Begging rights like that would be considered Hat collecting There are plenty of other tools out there. Twinkle is not the only tool. In fact rollback is actually worse compared to other tools, when it comes to reverting. If you contribute using a desktop, you can also try RedWarn, or it's successor Ultraviolet. Cheers! OPHYRIUS ⚔ 09:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
@Ophyrius
I strictly take back the begging and pleading part! I was indeed desperate yesterday.
Funny you now say rollback is worse. (Not sure if I can believe you)
Just this morning I coded a python update to a script entry I took from the anti-vandal tool. And it shockingly improved the speed of the manual revert method efficiently on my side.
And reduced time to auto warn editors, with customizable settings.
Not sure if I should come back to make another request. But I certainly will if i'm interested.
However, I still have this burning desire to help Wikipedia, and it can't be stopped.
Have a good day. Criticize (talk) 09:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm saying that as I personally have used it & I find other tools better. I used that permission for other tools like Antivandal & SWViewer OPHYRIUS ⚔ 11:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Nothing has changed since your prior declined request. Malinaccier (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Vineyard93

I am respectfully requesting rollback rights as I am committed to upholding the quality and reliability of Wikipedia by actively monitoring recent changes and promptly reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. Having familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, I believe that the rollback tool will allow me to more efficiently contribute to the maintenance of article integrity and the overall improvement of the encyclopedia. Vineyard93 (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 01:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    .

    Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
    Expired PRODs (1)
    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 1
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 1
    Importance or significance not asserted 1
    Other candidates 13
    RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

    No RfXs since 19:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

    Barnstars

    The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
    For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you!
    Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


    The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
    for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
    The Barnstar of Diligence
    I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Doug_Weller&oldid=1274803980"