User talk:WWGB: Difference between revisions
→Sorry...: thanks and a request |
→Sorry...: yes |
||
Line 335: | Line 335: | ||
Sorry I blocked you! {{blush}} I tried to get the IP blocked quickly, and I guess it got too complicated for me. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 12:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC). |
Sorry I blocked you! {{blush}} I tried to get the IP blocked quickly, and I guess it got too complicated for me. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 12:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC). |
||
:{{ping|Bishonen}} That's OK, I understand such things can happen. And thanks for blocking the troll. He has been stalking me for a while using different IP addresses. I do have one request. I have been around Wikipedia since 2006 and have a clean record (no blocks). Is it possible to remove today's snafu ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AWWGB]) from the bottom of the block log page? Although it is evident that the block was immediately reversed, I would prefer to keep my unblemished record. Thanks, [[User:WWGB|WWGB]] ([[User talk:WWGB#top|talk]]) 12:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Bishonen}} That's OK, I understand such things can happen. And thanks for blocking the troll. He has been stalking me for a while using different IP addresses. I do have one request. I have been around Wikipedia since 2006 and have a clean record (no blocks). Is it possible to remove today's snafu ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AWWGB]) from the bottom of the block log page? Although it is evident that the block was immediately reversed, I would prefer to keep my unblemished record. Thanks, [[User:WWGB|WWGB]] ([[User talk:WWGB#top|talk]]) 12:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Yes, I think it's possible, if you're sure. I've never done it before, but I hope it'll work. Done. I'm very proud of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3ABishonen my own block log], for my part! (The block by Jimbo is the star item.) A "clean" block log is uninteresting, IMO. But I've cleaned yours, according to your preference. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 12:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC). |
Revision as of 12:56, 16 January 2023
Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12 |
My Awards
Extended content
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() HI! THANKS FOR THE FEEDBACK! JackGann (talk) 07:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() Way to pounce! I went to do this exact edit a minute after you... stop reading my mind! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
|
My DYK
Extended content
| ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On 14 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Schoharie limousine crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the stretch limousine involved in the recent crash near Schoharie, New York, killing 20, appeared at two vehicle inspections earlier this year with different license plates? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Schoharie limousine crash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. A beer for you!
Christchurch mosque shootingsThanks for keeping the international reactions under control. AIRcorn (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!![]() For your work on Christchurch_mosque_shootings. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Fame at last...
How does Wikipedia deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. No mention of me though:). Nice diagrams, and a quick look at the page histories of shooting incidents will show a core of regular editors.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 17:30, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
HI WWGB, I'm a researcher at Sydney Uni and would like to contact you. I'm not sure how best to do this and hoping this message somehow reaches you....Doctor 17. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doctor 17 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
- This initial contact led to this article. WWGB (talk) 02:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Were you aware?
I assume that you have been made aware of this. But, in the event that you were not, I wanted to point it out to you and bring this to your attention. Your name was mentioned in this article: How does Wikipedia deal with a mass shooting? A frenzied start gives way to a few core editors. Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Join the club
Hi. Because I am retired, I never realised until very recently that you have also been a victim of harassment from Chris Sherlock. Perhaps the community needs to step up its vigilance for such characters - on second thoughts, perhaps not, the victims of such people usually end up with the thin end of the wedge as I and many others have. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Sorry...
Sorry I blocked you! I tried to get the IP blocked quickly, and I guess it got too complicated for me. Bishonen | tålk 12:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: That's OK, I understand such things can happen. And thanks for blocking the troll. He has been stalking me for a while using different IP addresses. I do have one request. I have been around Wikipedia since 2006 and have a clean record (no blocks). Is it possible to remove today's snafu ([2]) from the bottom of the block log page? Although it is evident that the block was immediately reversed, I would prefer to keep my unblemished record. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it's possible, if you're sure. I've never done it before, but I hope it'll work. Done. I'm very proud of my own block log, for my part! (The block by Jimbo is the star item.) A "clean" block log is uninteresting, IMO. But I've cleaned yours, according to your preference. Bishonen | tålk 12:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC).