User talk:Bbb23: Difference between revisions

Honey Bxby draft

Do you mind if I recreate Draft:Honey Bxby? Don't want to raise sock concerns given that it was G5 deleted. wizzito | say hello! 20:56, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

No problem at all.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Sock

Hi this case was closed due to 1 edit but they've made several since [1] [2]. See also personal attacks by likely sock [3] Can action be taken? Thanks. Magherbin (talk) 07:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

I see the single edit by the new named user and that is indeed a personal attack, but I don't see any new edits by the IP - their last edit is still on May 20. Why don't you file a new report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bennyblanco10 naming the new user as a sock?--Bbb23 (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

You deleted my sandbox

I think it was a mistake, I never intended to make this public and just a place were I can make my Ideas. And you might have thought that I making an article. When in reality I was just make it a playground for my ideas, I mean isn’t that the reason the sandbox even exist. So please undelete my sandbox. Fad8229 (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hoaxes aren't permitted anywhere on Wikipedia, even in sandboxes.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

WTF if I can’t show my ideas on sandbox because it’s not truthful, then why even have sandbox in the first place. Like seriously are you appealing to people IQ of 0? Everyone know that not truthful, but thats not the point, it meant to just me being creative, and I guess I’ll put miraheze because unlike Wikipedia, they actually value creativity instead of lottery everything truthful. Fad8229 (talk) 17:18, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

IP sockpuppet

Hello. I saw you closing the ANI thread just now, I didn’t manage to comment that it was a sock IP that got blocked recently and it appears their block expired so they’re back stalking me again. Two of their three possible ranges were blocked recently for socking [4], [5], [6]. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

The Bushranger, you blocked Special:contributions/37.155.0.0/17 on May 15 for one week, and you blocked Special:contributions/5.176.0.0/18 on May 13, also for one week. My block of the single IP at ANI was easy - and I've just revoked TPA for that IP - but I'm uncomfortable blocking widish ranges without knowing more about the underlying problem, which, at the moment, I don't have the time to delve into. You, OTOH, might want to reblock.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

For context [7]. They pulled a similar ANI stunt not so long ago where the socking was exposed; it started even before that but I didn’t pay too much attention until the more recent aggressive stalking, some people just got nothing better to do. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

The problem is that this is - it seems - a long-term 'offender' (for want of a better term) who cares not for the ECR part of GS/AA, and gets...well, you saw how they were on today's ANI thread, when their ignoring that results in sanctions. The 35.155*/17 range there seems remarkably stable for them - from the history, they've been on that range since at least June 2023, and there look to be very few potential collateral damage edits from blocking that range. Given that I'll reblock it for three months this time. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:15, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Help

Hello there,
A few years ago, you had deleted the article Pankaj Dhyani as it was created by a blocked user. Can I recreate the article with some better sources? As it has been a few years, I got some more sources in my hand. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 08:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Sure.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

72.92.37.34

• 2600:1002:B0C9:D39A:0:5:C72C:7101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• 2600:1002:B056:B5CA:0:25:AF05:AC01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hi, not sure how I would exactly report this at AIV with two IPs that I'm not quite sure if they have any range in common or not, but figured I'd come to you... reason being, both the above IPs have recently been doing disruptive edits across multiple articles, the second IP starting very shortly after concluding(?) editing at the first. However, the interesting part is that the second IP re-created Draft:Trash (2020 film), which was originally created in October 2023 by the IP 72.92.37.34. Taking a look at that IP (that you previously blocked in August 2024), it looks like the above 2 IPs may be related (block evasion), of that IP, with similar edits/editing, including both the first IP and 72.92.37.34 both editing on List of The Ren & Stimpy Show episodes- see this versus this.

Any chance anything can be done with this?... Magitroopa (talk) 16:40, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

I've blocked Special:contributions/2600:1002:B000:0:0:0:0:0/40 for one year for block evasion. I've deleted a bunch of drafts they created per WP:G5. If I missed any, you're welcome to tag them. Also, all of their edits are subject to WP:BANREVERT, and they're quite prolific.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Sultan Ul Arifeen Hazrat Syed Rakhyal Shah Sufi Al Qadri

Please Help Me Please Unblock Page Sultan Ul Arifeen Hazrat Syed Rakhyal Shah Sufi Al Qadri & relaible source available in news paper pahenji Akhbar https://epaper.pahenjiakhbar.com/epaper/edition/1571/pahenji-akhbar/page/5 Please request my accept & please unblock page sultan arifeen hazrat syed rakhyal shah sufi al qadri please help me ATIF ALI JISKANI 2346 & (talk) 19:33, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, can't understand what you're saying.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Request to Allow Edits on Article – Sultan Ul Arifeen Hazrat Syed Rakhyal Shah Sufi Al Qadri

Dear Bbb23,

I hope you're well. The article "Sultan ul Arifeen Hazrat Syed Rakhyal Shah Sufi Al Qadri" was protected earlier. I now have a reliable newspaper source to support the content.

Here is the reference link from Pahenji Akhbar (Sindhi Daily):

https://epaper.pahenjiakhbar.com/epaper/edition/1571/pahenji-akhbar/page/5

I request edit access or guidance on how to proceed. I will follow all Wikipedia content and sourcing guidelines.

Thank you for your time ATIF ALI JISKANI 2346 & (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

I assume you're referring to Rakhyal Shah, which you are prevented from editing because I indefinitely blocked you from editing that page on May 5, 2025, for edit-warring and adding promotional content. If you wish to be unblocked, you should make a request on your Talk page. I will not edit the article for you; your request is just a end-run around your block.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Dear Bbb23,

Thank you for your response. I sincerely apologize for my previous actions that led to the block, including any edit-warring or content that may have been seen as promotional. My intention was only to share verifiable information about a respected historical and spiritual figure.

I now understand Wikipedia’s guidelines regarding neutral point of view, conflict of interest, and proper sourcing. I take full responsibility and assure you that I will avoid any such issues in the future.

I kindly request a reconsideration of the block so I can contribute in line with Wikipedia’s standards. I’m willing to work collaboratively and respectfully with other editors and administrators moving forward.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

https://epaper.pahenjiakhbar.com/epaper/edition/1571/pahenji-akhbar/page/5 ATIF ALI JISKANI 2346 & (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Deletion review for Urutau (3D Printable Firearm)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Urutau (3D Printable Firearm). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Superlincoln (talk) 14:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

ANI discussion

Hey, just an FYI, there's this discussion that was opened since it doesn't appear they notified you. Sergecross73 msg me 15:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

It is imperative that you respond as the thread has taken an alarming turn. Hurry. tempis fugit. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra:, he is not responding because he knows he is guilty. I'm surprised he lasted this long. Luis7M (talk) 15:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)