Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:
* '''[[:Şahin İmzaoğlu]] → {{noredirect|Shahin Imranov}}''' — As a result of vandalism, the page cannot be moved to the requested name by ordinary users, as technically it already "exists". — [[User:Parishan|Parishan]] ([[User talk:Parishan|talk]]) 01:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''[[:Şahin İmzaoğlu]] → {{noredirect|Shahin Imranov}}''' — As a result of vandalism, the page cannot be moved to the requested name by ordinary users, as technically it already "exists". — [[User:Parishan|Parishan]] ([[User talk:Parishan|talk]]) 01:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''[[:Elche/Elx]] → {{noredirect|Elche}}''' — Discussion took place on talk page a month ago that having 2 names in 2 different languages with a slash is unusual and undesireable for naming an article. No objections have been noted on talk page and 3 dictionaries and 3 encyclopedias all list the main entry of this Spanish city as ''Elche''. Tried to move the page manually, but it stated that the page already existed. — [[User:Kman543210|Kman543210]] ([[User talk:Kman543210|talk]]) 04:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
* '''[[:Elche/Elx]] → {{noredirect|Elche}}''' — Discussion took place on talk page a month ago that having 2 names in 2 different languages with a slash is unusual and undesireable for naming an article. No objections have been noted on talk page and 3 dictionaries and 3 encyclopedias all list the main entry of this Spanish city as ''Elche''. Tried to move the page manually, but it stated that the page already existed. — [[User:Kman543210|Kman543210]] ([[User talk:Kman543210|talk]]) 04:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

* '''[[:95KGGO Arena]] → {{noredirect|Buccaneer Arena}}''' 95KGGO Arena changed its name to Buccaneer Arena (its original name). Buccaneer Arena exists currently as a redirect to 95KGGO Arena when it should be the opposite. [[User:DandyDan2007|DandyDan2007]] ([[User talk:DandyDan2007|talk]]) 04:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


==Incomplete and contested proposals==
==Incomplete and contested proposals==

Revision as of 04:25, 28 September 2008

Administrator instructions

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page.

Before moving a page or requesting a move, please review the article titling policy and the guidelines on primary topics.

Any autoconfirmed user can move a page using the "Move" option in the editing toolbar; see how to move a page for more information. If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

  • Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. In such cases, see § Requesting technical moves.
  • Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
  • A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
  • A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
  • Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are typically processed after seven days. If consensus supports the move at or after this time, a reviewer will perform it. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved." When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time, or closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

When not to use this page

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

Undiscussed moves

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

  • No article exists at the new target title;
  • There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
  • It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Uncontroversial proposals

Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required.

If you object to a proposal listed here, please re-list it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.

Incomplete and contested proposals

With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move request, please do not discuss move requests here. If you support an incomplete or contested move request, please consider following the instructions above to create a full move request, and move the discussion to the "Other Proposals" section below. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

The page was moved the other way in 2005, with the argument that "de Quito" is not part of the team's name. This moves seems slightly controversial, and it may be best to get feedback on the article's talk page. 87.114.155.75 (talk) 11:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that move and have to state that the guy who moved the page probably had no idea what he was talking about. There are 6 Liga Deportiva Universitarias in Ecuador, making LDU, itself, a generic part of the teams name in the same context as FC in a bunch of other football team's name (like FC Barcelona or Manchester United F.C.). "de Quito" is part of the team's name and has to be part of the title. Period. Digirami (talk) 22:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Yerba maté displays the Latin American discomfort with the accented é due to its Spanish pronunciation, but also that all English authorities (OED, MW, EB, &c.) give maté as the proper English spelling; also has benefit of removing unnecessary beverage tag and putting page where most likely to be searched by native English speakers. Cf. WP:ENGLISH & WP:OR.

Other proposals

Purge the cache to refresh this page

  • Sámuel Teleki (explorer)Sámuel Teleki —(Discuss)— Revert to previous name of this page. This person appears to be the primary usage for the name "Sámuel Teleki", with many incoming links from articles about Kenya etc and from evidence of Google search. The page was inappropriately moved to "... (explorer)" and a new page was created for the other holder of the name at the undisambiguated form of the name. I have moved the new article to "... (book collector)" as this seems the main thing the other person is famous for, and corrected all necessary links, and wish to move this article back to its original title. --PamD (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC) PamD (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sacrifice hitSacrifice bunt —(Discuss)— "Sacrifice bunt" is:
    • more common (over 1.5 million hits on google to less than 500,000 for "sacrifice hit", and in my experience as a baseball fan I have never heard the term "sacrifice hit" used—not that that counts for anything by itself :)),
    • more accurate (a sacrifice, by nature, cannot be a hit, and for the purposes of this article the only kind of hit ball that can be a sacrifice is a bunt), and
    • more official (rule 10 of the official ML rules regarding scorekeeping uses the term "sacrifice bunt" in all but one incidence describing this play).

I can see no reason for this article to be under the title "sacrifice hit" instead of "sacrifice bunt". --Pmr2011 (talk) 17:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There have been quite a few days without any response from anyone. The only person disagreeing with the move withdrew his complaint in the end. Diego_pmc Talk 17:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk: Kiev/naming where this is under debate. Theone00 (talk) 04:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog

Move dated sections here after five days have passed (May 31 or older).