User talk:Princess of Ara: Difference between revisions
Celestina007 (talk | contribs) Notification: I've commented on your Articles for Creation submission (AFCH 0.9.1) |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 836: | Line 836: | ||
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] |
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] |
||
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Omah Lay]]. Thanks! '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 22:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC) </div> |
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Omah Lay]]. Thanks! '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 22:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC) </div> |
||
:{{u|Celestina007}}, I believe that your assertion in that draft is wrong {{tq|The draft article cannot literally be accepted because the title has been protected and you have to contact the admin who protected it to remove the protection.}} If you're going to accept the draft, accept it first and an administrator will remove the protection. Best, —[[User:Nnadigoodluck|'''<span style="color:#0000B3;">Nnadigoodluck</span>''']][[User talk:Nnadigoodluck|<span style="color:#008751;font-size:80%">█</span><span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:80%">█</span><span style="color:#008751;font-size:80%">█</span>]] 22:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:34, 14 April 2021
TheSokks, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi TheSokks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC) |
Suggestions
TheSokks (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Folasade Ogunsola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clostridium difficile. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Suggest
TheSokks (talk) 14:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Successful appeal
I am just formally noting that the editor behind this account has had an appeal accepted by the Arbitration Committee. This account had not been blocked so I cannot note it in the block log. Maxim(talk) 20:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Maxim Thank you. The Sokks (talk) 23:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Brilliant new article about NdaniTV. The company was a star of Wikipedia as for many years it published its material on line with a free to use license. Look at the great set of pictures that are available on line that came from NdaniTV. Sadly their policy changed but a great contribution to open info for Nigeria. Keep up the great work. Victuallers (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC) |
- @Victuallers Thank you for the kind words and for the wikilinks. I'll take a look at the pictures. Really do appreciate the support. The Sokks💕 (talk) 10:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted article talk pages
Please do not post messages on the talk page of deleted articles. If you would like to contact me, please use my user talk page, which will be linked in my signature. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies for that. Will do. The Sokks💕 (talk) 21:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
About Erica Nlewedim article
You can submit the draft at AfC and if it's accepted, it'll be unsalted. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 21:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Nnadigoodluck, How do I do that please? The Sokks💕 (talk) 21:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Read all about it here. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 21:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created, FK Abudu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I just happened to stumble on the FK Abudu article and it definitely looked unworthy to remain on mainspace & moved it to draft where it could be incubated. I don’t want you to assume I made the move in bad faith given your past block due to sock puppetry, it was after the move I read your talk page and saw you had being blocked previously due to sock puppetry. My advise would be for you to submit it via the AFC method & avoid creating articles for people you may have a conflict of interest with, @MrsSnoozyTurtle affixed the {{Notability}}
& {{Fanpov}}
tag on both articles & i wholeheartedly agree with both tags. The subject of the article isn’t notable per WP:ONEEVENT & the article's tone is completely off. Use the AFC method like I suggested & hopefully a good afc editor would assist you. Celestina007 (talk) 19:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I actually read the WP:ONEEVENT before creating the page and it says if their contribution was significant enough, they can get a stand alone page. But I’ll continue working on it as a draft and do the afc submission. Also, I was ‘accused’ of behaving badly not that I actually did and got blocked without investigation. I was able to appeal to ArbCom. Thank you once again. The Sokks💕 (talk) 04:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Significant enough is very much subjective & vaguely worded and does a great disservice to the collaborative project (obviously not your fault), The guidelines you should have at the back of your mind when creating such articles are WP:GNG whilst optimizing RS to show us WP:ONEEVENT doesn’t necessarily apply. If two-third of RS provided are related to specific events ie (ENDSARS) then ONEEVENT invariably applies. It’s a real tricky spot you have got yourself in. WP:TOOSOON greatly applies here too. I also noticed you have drafted the Draft:Erica Nlewedim article, which SPA's have tried to get into mainspace unsuccessfully, all of which I’ve mentioned applies to the subject of that draft article also & this is yet another tricky spot you’ve got yourself in. AGF, but another major problem here is both articles are usually areas edited majorly by the Nigerian UPE ring. I’m not sure what account name you edited with previously & I think it’s best not to even know in order for me to continue to AGF. Celestina007 (talk) 01:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm. Didn't quite come across the 2/3rd RS policy while reading up but it quite makes sense. It's rather unfortunate for me that my interests are related to Nigerian UPE circles. But any other thing will be like taking work home for me so I’d rather just stick to doing afcs and waiting for these drafts to skip the one event hurdle. Thank you. Kind regards The Sokks💕 (talk) 06:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- The two-third RS comment I made isn’t policy based but rather arbitrary. Invariably if more than half or a super majority of the RS do not reference the individual but the event, then ONEEVENT applies. I’m not sure if to call it inductive or deductive reasoning but it’s good you understand my POV. 1E is so vaguely worded & even contradicts itself, I’d have to start an RFC on that sooner than later but oh well like I said, GNG, and perhaps BASIC should be at the back of your mind when creating articles such as the aforementioned. It’s only wise to use the AFC process at this juncture to avoid the unnecessary stress as you implied. Celestina007 (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Id try as much as can be to be objective but speaking freely I’m very much concerned about FK Abudu having a Wikipedia biographical piece on her because asides the fact that she isn’t notable, FK Abudu is arguably the worst case of individuals who merely want biographical pieces on them for the vanity sake of it & using Wikipedia as a platform for creating awareness for herself(promoting herself) & I have a mountain of evidence to corroborate what I just stated above, an evidence I would be sharing with functionaries only & my senior colleagues. Celestina007 (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the policies are tbh. Nothing is set in stone. Even the WP:BASIC says 'coverage in multiple published sources'. If we're being honest, multiple is more than one but then there's WP:THREE. About FK Abudu trying to get an article, I find it very surprising because I follow her on twitter and she does not come off as one of those 'showy' type of Nigerians. She comes of as 'DGAF' (excuse my French) I guess social media is really smoke and mirrors then. The Sokks💕 (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- imo the idgaf attitude is a facade. It’s a lot evidence I have but can’t be discussed on wiki as that would definitely constitute OUTING. It’s really a Catch-22 you’re currently in. Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- I’m sorry, but you’ve lost me there. How or why am I the one in a catch-22? The Sokks💕 (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Well don’t get lost. How about you scrap that last part & just follow all the instructions I have given you before then which is (using the AFC process) Cheers. Celestina007 (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I’m sorry, but you’ve lost me there. How or why am I the one in a catch-22? The Sokks💕 (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- imo the idgaf attitude is a facade. It’s a lot evidence I have but can’t be discussed on wiki as that would definitely constitute OUTING. It’s really a Catch-22 you’re currently in. Celestina007 (talk) 23:14, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the policies are tbh. Nothing is set in stone. Even the WP:BASIC says 'coverage in multiple published sources'. If we're being honest, multiple is more than one but then there's WP:THREE. About FK Abudu trying to get an article, I find it very surprising because I follow her on twitter and she does not come off as one of those 'showy' type of Nigerians. She comes of as 'DGAF' (excuse my French) I guess social media is really smoke and mirrors then. The Sokks💕 (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Id try as much as can be to be objective but speaking freely I’m very much concerned about FK Abudu having a Wikipedia biographical piece on her because asides the fact that she isn’t notable, FK Abudu is arguably the worst case of individuals who merely want biographical pieces on them for the vanity sake of it & using Wikipedia as a platform for creating awareness for herself(promoting herself) & I have a mountain of evidence to corroborate what I just stated above, an evidence I would be sharing with functionaries only & my senior colleagues. Celestina007 (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- The two-third RS comment I made isn’t policy based but rather arbitrary. Invariably if more than half or a super majority of the RS do not reference the individual but the event, then ONEEVENT applies. I’m not sure if to call it inductive or deductive reasoning but it’s good you understand my POV. 1E is so vaguely worded & even contradicts itself, I’d have to start an RFC on that sooner than later but oh well like I said, GNG, and perhaps BASIC should be at the back of your mind when creating articles such as the aforementioned. It’s only wise to use the AFC process at this juncture to avoid the unnecessary stress as you implied. Celestina007 (talk) 15:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm. Didn't quite come across the 2/3rd RS policy while reading up but it quite makes sense. It's rather unfortunate for me that my interests are related to Nigerian UPE circles. But any other thing will be like taking work home for me so I’d rather just stick to doing afcs and waiting for these drafts to skip the one event hurdle. Thank you. Kind regards The Sokks💕 (talk) 06:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Em-em talk 22:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)I saw you placed a merge tag at Category:Nigerian obstetricians suggesting a merge to Category: Nigerian gynaecologists. This is usually done slightly differently at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion if you want to start a proper discussion about it feel free to but you should probably read through Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 December 10#Category:Nigerian obstetricians where this was proposed a few years ago. If you have any questions or want help with the nomination feel free to ask! --Trialpears (talk) 16:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Trialpears, thank you for bringing this to my notice. I have read through the previous discussion at Categories for deletion and I've gone on to remove the template even though in Nigeria, GYNs are the same as OBs unlike in some other countries. The specialty training is carried out in tandem even though one may decide to practice solely as a GYN or OB post qualification. I'll try to articulate my thoughts and consider relisting the discussion. Thank you! The Sokks💕 (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity & addressing other potential problems
Hello, it seems you have a lot of insider information on and may be well connected to the Feminist Coalition so I figured you could be of help here. Let me start by addressing this(although the whole promo section has been removed by DGG and rightfully so) the problematic edit I saw you make, was you removing the redlink on Damilola Odufuwa per WP:RED that was a wrong move because they do have potential to be notable, However removing red links on subjects who aren’t notable or ever likely to be notable are welcome. Secondly, I agree that FK Abudu isn’t a founding member but what do you mean by an “auxiliary member” ? I searched their website and she appears to be listed as a member and not once was the the term “auxiliary member” used so I’m trying to understand how you came about using the term “auxiliary” is there a RS that references her with such term? or is it just an arbitrary term you came up with? If yes that would just be conjecture bothering on WP:OR. Sorry if this is a bother but giving you are an expert on the organization I decided asking you would be okay-ish. Finally this advice by you to Tygeera is premature & very ill informed and would only result in a boomerang block on them. Celestina007 (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello @Celestina007, I do not have any insider information or have any connection to Fem Co or its members and definitely, not an expert. I really wonder how my edits point to these assertions. Anyway, About the redlink, it was an honest mistake. I didn't know about WP:RED but I've now read up on it and noted my error. The term 'auxiliary member' was used in this article. About my suggestion to Tygeera, I noted the back and forth because the page is on my watchlist and was my honest suggestion to prevent themselves from getting blocked. If it boomerangs, all well and good I guess. The Sokks💕 (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- you linked them to ANI which is extremely premature. If it boomerangs it’s definitely “not all well and good”, as we would have lost another editor. Just be more careful next time. Celestina007 (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm. I thought that was the usual sequence for resolution when a consensus is not reached via talk pages. This is noted. Thank you. The Sokks💕 (talk) 20:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not quite, the ANI isn’t a platform for content dispute settlements & has never been the go to venue for content dispute resolution. The purpose of ANI is clearly outlined in WP:AN/I, id suggest that before giving advice to anyone that you yourself understand policy before doing so. Celestina007 (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm. I thought that was the usual sequence for resolution when a consensus is not reached via talk pages. This is noted. Thank you. The Sokks💕 (talk) 20:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- you linked them to ANI which is extremely premature. If it boomerangs it’s definitely “not all well and good”, as we would have lost another editor. Just be more careful next time. Celestina007 (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello @Celestina007, I do not have any insider information or have any connection to Fem Co or its members and definitely, not an expert. I really wonder how my edits point to these assertions. Anyway, About the redlink, it was an honest mistake. I didn't know about WP:RED but I've now read up on it and noted my error. The term 'auxiliary member' was used in this article. About my suggestion to Tygeera, I noted the back and forth because the page is on my watchlist and was my honest suggestion to prevent themselves from getting blocked. If it boomerangs, all well and good I guess. The Sokks💕 (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- As Celestina007 says, ANI is best avoided unless nothing else will work, and you are very sure indeed of your case. Decisions there tend to be over-hasty and unpredictable. Indeed, in my 14 years here as an administrator, I have never advised anyone to go there. And almost nobody who has gone there anyway has been the better for it (which is what Celestina means by "boomerang" . Discussion comes first, and asking for advice next. DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is noted. Thank you. The Sokks💕 (talk) 06:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Celestina007 (talk) 00:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
versacespacetalk to me 02:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, TheSokks
Thank you for creating Bolaji Owasanoye.
User:Nnadigoodluck, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating this great article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
—Nnadigoodluck███ 07:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Nnadigoodluck: Thank you! I appreciate this. The Sokks💕 (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Font tags in sig
Hi, just wondering if you would be willing to update your sig to change the font tags to span tags? The reason is that font tags are deprecated and show up at Lint errors, so it's best not to use them for new content. Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- @WOSlinker: Done ✅ The Sokks💕 (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Sig | HTML | |
---|---|---|
Current: | The Sokks💕 (talk) | [[User:TheSokks| The Sokks]]💕 <sup>[[User talk:TheSokks|<font face="Helvetica"><font color="#FF0080"></font><sub><small><font color="blue">(talk)</font></small></sub></font>]]</sup> |
Proposed: | The Sokks💕 (talk) | [[User:TheSokks| The Sokks]]💕 <sup>[[User talk:TheSokks|<span style="font-family:Helvetica"><span style="color:#FF0080"></span><sub><small><span style="color:blue">(talk)</span></small></sub></span>]]</sup> |
Thank you @WOSlinker:, I’ll update as soon as I get to my computer. Thanks. The Sokks💕 (talk) 11:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for all the great articles you're creating. More grease. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 12:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
@Nnadigoodluck: Thank you for the help and support you’ve been like a silent guardian angel. Well done. The Sokks💕 (talk) 15:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Celestina007, I believe that your assertion in that draft is wrong
The draft article cannot literally be accepted because the title has been protected and you have to contact the admin who protected it to remove the protection.
If you're going to accept the draft, accept it first and an administrator will remove the protection. Best, —Nnadigoodluck███ 22:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)