Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory Obasi: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Comment
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Reply
Line 41: Line 41:
* '''Keep''': procedural keep and nominate articles individually. Some may meet [[WP:SIGCOV]]. Obasi was covered in [https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/01/gorgeous-victory-obasi-becomes-17th-beautiful-girl-abuja/ 2018], [https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/12/queen-victory-obasi-unveils-book-on-agriculture/ 2019], and [https://aljazirahnews.com/nigerian-lady-vows-to-buy-2023-presidential-nomination-form-for-yahaya-bello/ 2020]. [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] ([[User talk:TJMSmith|talk]]) 22:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC) <!--VCB TJMSmith-->
* '''Keep''': procedural keep and nominate articles individually. Some may meet [[WP:SIGCOV]]. Obasi was covered in [https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/01/gorgeous-victory-obasi-becomes-17th-beautiful-girl-abuja/ 2018], [https://www.vanguardngr.com/2019/12/queen-victory-obasi-unveils-book-on-agriculture/ 2019], and [https://aljazirahnews.com/nigerian-lady-vows-to-buy-2023-presidential-nomination-form-for-yahaya-bello/ 2020]. [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] ([[User talk:TJMSmith|talk]]) 22:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC) <!--VCB TJMSmith-->
* '''Keep''' and nominate separately. As TJMSmith noted, there is varying notability going on between these articles. Batch nominations don't allow for actual consideration of each article subject. I can only assume that anyone above who made blanket claims about lack of sourcing didn't bother to take the time to look for any whatsoever ([[WP:BEFORE]]), since there's significant coverage for several of the subjects, while others are lacking any meaningful coverage. [[User:Silver seren|<span style="color: silver;">Silver</span>]][[User talk:Silver seren|<span style="color: blue;">seren</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 22:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' and nominate separately. As TJMSmith noted, there is varying notability going on between these articles. Batch nominations don't allow for actual consideration of each article subject. I can only assume that anyone above who made blanket claims about lack of sourcing didn't bother to take the time to look for any whatsoever ([[WP:BEFORE]]), since there's significant coverage for several of the subjects, while others are lacking any meaningful coverage. [[User:Silver seren|<span style="color: silver;">Silver</span>]][[User talk:Silver seren|<span style="color: blue;">seren</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 22:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
::@{{u|Silver seren}} an in-depth before was done alright, I mass nominated 6 articles in all and four have already been deleted. But if you can show me the sources that meet requirements which are outlined in GNG that show notability for any of the remainder I’d be happy to see them. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 17:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
::@{{u|Silver seren}} an in-depth before was done alright, I mass nominated 6 articles in all and four have already been deleted. But if you can show me the sources that meet requirements which are outlined in GNG that show notability for any of the remainder I’d be happy to see them. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 17:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
:::Have you looked at the sources that TJMSmith presented up above? Also, sorry, but MER-C's actions were completely out of line and I'm tempted to go to ANI over this. Trying to use the G5's as an argument is completely inappropriate. Especially since G5 is a worthless CSD claim. [[User:Silver seren|<span style="color: silver;">Silver</span>]][[User talk:Silver seren|<span style="color: blue;">seren</span>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Silver seren|C]]</sup> 18:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
* '''Delete [[Victory Obasi]] and keep others to be individually nominated''' - I did my due diligence and Victory does not merit inclusion due to failing [[WP:GNG]]. But, I agree with [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] and [[User:Silver seren]] that the others should be examined as their own AfD nominations - individually. Thanks. [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain|talk]]) 00:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
* '''Delete [[Victory Obasi]] and keep others to be individually nominated''' - I did my due diligence and Victory does not merit inclusion due to failing [[WP:GNG]]. But, I agree with [[User:TJMSmith|TJMSmith]] and [[User:Silver seren]] that the others should be examined as their own AfD nominations - individually. Thanks. [[User:Missvain|Missvain]] ([[User talk:Missvain|talk]]) 00:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Note''' — Creator of all the articles listed in this AFD has now been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Luciapop#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet '''blocked'''] for being a suspected sock of the serial article spammer and LTA editor known as {{u|Ugbedeg}}. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 16:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
*'''Note''' — Creator of all the articles listed in this AFD has now been [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Luciapop#Blocked_as_a_sockpuppet '''blocked'''] for being a suspected sock of the serial article spammer and LTA editor known as {{u|Ugbedeg}}. '''[[User:Celestina007|Celestina007]]''' ([[User talk:Celestina007|talk]]) 16:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:32, 24 December 2021

Victory Obasi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From here, Strong possible UPE article spamming on notable individuals who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them a before shows press releases, user generated sources, optimization of primary sources, pr sponsored post and unreliable sources which have their bylines as “Editor” which is indicative of an op-ed not attributed to any prominent author thus all are unreliable sources (pieces) The possible UPE editor has had their Autopatrol stripped, but now we need to do the hard work by cleaning up(deleting) their possible paid editing articles. Celestina007 (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am also nominating the following related pages because they are not notable and were all created by the UPE spammer:
Adeaga Bukunmi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rotimi Bankole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tayo Amusan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Karl Toriola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Tobechukwu Okigbo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Funso Aina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
BBC Pidgin, BBC Yoruba, and FabWoman all cover her by the name Kie Kie. TJMSmith (talk) 22:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Silver seren an in-depth before was done alright, I mass nominated 6 articles in all and four have already been deleted. But if you can show me the sources that meet requirements which are outlined in GNG that show notability for any of the remainder I’d be happy to see them. Celestina007 (talk) 17:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have you looked at the sources that TJMSmith presented up above? Also, sorry, but MER-C's actions were completely out of line and I'm tempted to go to ANI over this. Trying to use the G5's as an argument is completely inappropriate. Especially since G5 is a worthless CSD claim. SilverserenC 18:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]