Talk:Ananda Lewis

Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

unreferenced material

Unreferenced material has been removed. Please properly reference anything that is readded.--Rtphokie (talk) 22:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ananda Lewis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080908084837/http://www.hwwilson.com/currentbio/cover_bios/cover_bio_6_05.htm to http://www.hwwilson.com/currentbio/cover_bios/cover_bio_6_05.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference removal

Pinging: @HumanWritesBook

Is there a reason for mass-removing citations throughout the article? Now it appears that the article is heavily unreferenced. The "Later career" and "Personal life" section are now fully unsourced, and the "Early career" section only has one source. There is nothing wrong with using multiple sources in different places. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 23:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GalacticVelocity08 Thank you for your participation! Please note that the references that have been omitted were the ones used multiple times ... from what I recall in detail, reference #9 (which the system counted as being noted up to 12 times throughout the article, which is redundant and unnecessary, is now noted once in the reference list) and reference #10 (which the system counted as being noted up to 9 times throughout the article, which is redundant and unnecessary, is now noted once in the reference list). there is more than enough credible sourced material available about the subject to proceed with addressing the need of additional supporting evidence material references throughout the article ... this is something that I, for one, hold the clear intent on participating in the action of editorial clean-up, adding additional noteworthy details in addition to the expansion of references list, for the record. HumanWritesBook (talk) 21:48, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]