Talk:Brehon

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Celts Low‑importance

	Brehon is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The contents of Brigh Brigaid was merged into Brehon. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brehon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150714105039/http://www.courts.ie/Courts.ie/library3.nsf/pagecurrent/3CBAE4FE856E917B80256DF800494ED9 to http://www.courts.ie/Courts.ie/library3.nsf/pagecurrent/3CBAE4FE856E917B80256DF800494ED9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brehon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6DVzqXp3z?url=http://technovate.org/web/etext/LOL.html to http://technovate.org/web/etext/LOL.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Large amount of information removed

I seen the moderators really have done hatchet job on information on here. Speaking as someone who has contributed in the past, i'm done with it now. What someone deems as irrelevant is not necessarily the case for somebody else who may have a deeper and broader interest in the subject. Just because the word 'brehon' isn't in the paragraph it shouldn't be automatically deleted. If there's not information that was deemed offensive to other persons why cut large swades of information. Many earliest Irish saints(born in Ireland) came from bardic and brehon families, thus the reason Culdees was mentioned. If editors want the scope information to become more restrictive and boring its up to them, it puts any future contributors off, possibly kills off the development of topic, why not reduce the page to a paragraph!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.212.222 (talk) 10:28, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Céilí Dé and Druim Cetta

When I first looked at the Brehon Law page a few years ago, it was directly on point and valuable. I took a look at it this morning and see that there are two entire sections that have nothing, really, to do with Brehon Law. The original editors seem to be denoted by their IP address and not a real account name. I have never edited Wikipedia and only signed up to fix this issue. I don't want to do massive surgery on the article because someone did invest a lot of time gathering this information, but it seems to have just been pasted here without thought as to how it dilutes the original material. Would anyone object if I moved "Brehon laws and the early Irish church (Céilí Dé)" and "Druim Cetta" to their own articles? RAHampton (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe leave things alone the old page was so much better than this 2601:546:8201:A540:0:0:0:9BD8 (talk) 22:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm cutting out some of the cruft. Bearian (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took out all of the irrelevant information, RAHampton. Bearian (talk) 22:25, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 23.114.165.222 (talk) 22:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint

I received an email complaining about the tone of one of my edit summaries, but not about the substance. I'm not going to copy and paste the OP's email, because it might be protected by copyright law, and I don't want it to boomerang. Anyone who has problems with anyone else's edits can revert all or part of their edits, cut and paste them into a different article, or use one of Wikipedia's many systems of dispute resolution. Bearian (talk) 21:48, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]