This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Two other articles (Parabon NanoLabs and List of arrest or identifications made with FamilyTreeDna) duplicate the information here about cases solved in the sub-section "Criminal Investigations." I suggest making a link from here to List of arrest or identifications made with FamilyTreeDna. I suppose this might run into trouble in the future if Parabon didn't use GEDmatch for some cases (There is also a sub-section "List of arrest or identifications made with FamilyTreeDna" in the article Family Tree DNA) and/or if Cece Moore left Parabon. Anybody any comments? SylviaStanley (talk) 16:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi @sylviastanley 30 months on! You're quite right, I think. There's far too much info on the specific cases under a fairly small entry on a single person. That seems best merged with another article. There seems to have been a lot of biog material removed over time, as far as a quick perusal looks, so perhaps the excessive case references began with initial entries which contained too much unjustifiable material? Emmentalist (talk) 08:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
