Jump to content

Talk:David Viaene

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:David Viaene/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 19:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:35, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • I'm not sure "twins" needs to be linked.
  • He was placed on injured reserve on August 28, 1988, and after comma not needed
  • References:
    • All appear to be consistently formatted and reliable for what is being cited
    • Spot checks: 3, 8, 11, 14, 16
    • After being released, he worked in construction with his father and served as a coach for Kaukauna High School.[14] After an injury to Harvey Salem, the Packers re-signed Viaene in October 1992 as a backup tackle.[14] you can remove the first inline cite since both sentences go to the same source
    • Ref 2 and 6 need an access-date

Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:02, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]

  • ... that in college, football player David Viaene was able to run a mile in equipment faster than some of his team's wide receivers, even though he weighed 285 pounds (129 kg)?
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 348 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Expanded from 495 to 3634 seven days before nom. Found a few fixes I had to do that the GAR didn't appear to notice, but otherwise nothing of note beyond article being good to go. ミラP@Miraclepine 21:44, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BeanieFan11, I'm not one to regularly pull up American football hooks on DYKINT, but you need to know what "wide receiver" means to find this interesting, and (unlike terms like "score a touchdown" or "kicker", where you can get some idea from the word alone) it's not immediately guessable that it means "fastest player on the field". I think some workshopping is needed. Thanks, though, for introducing me to the term "long snapper". ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: To be fair, I thought outsiders would be enticed by having to link to the term? After all, readers who hover their mouse on the link would know what exactly the linked item means, but then only on a PC. If that's not enough, I have a few ALTs (these are the only ones I was able to think of, and the second half is if enough people are familiar with the bench press):
ALT1A: ... that as the strongest player of his college football team, David Viaene was able to lift over 500 pounds (230 kg) of weights? He is the team's strongest player, bench pressing 500 pounds + In the weight room, he has bench pressed 505 pounds
ALT1B: ... that as the strongest player of his college football team, David Viaene was able to bench press 500 pounds (230 kg)? He is the team's strongest player, bench pressing 500 pounds + In the weight room, he has bench pressed 505 pounds
ALT2A: ... that in college, football player David Viaene was able to lift over 500 pounds (230 kg) of weights? In the weight room, he has bench pressed 505 pounds
ALT2B: ... that in college, football player David Viaene was able to bench press 500 pounds (230 kg)? In the weight room, he has bench pressed 505 pounds
ミラP@Miraclepine 00:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to think MOS:NOFORCELINK applies in these cases. I.E: you should be able to figure out meanings frok the hook. I'll leave the suggestions for BF11's approval. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: Well, I'm not sure printability and offline reading are as important a use for the main page as an article for NOFORCELINK to apply to DYK hooks (after all, DYK rules and article P&Gs are different sometimes), but we should take that to WT:DYK. Still, thank you. I'll let Beanie decide on the hooks. ミラP@Miraclepine 00:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with any of the proposed alt hooks. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]