Talk:Demi Sims

Demi Sims has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 15, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

England

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

Television: British / Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

A fact from Demi Sims appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 April 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Demi Sims (pictured) was described in December 2020 as one of the "very few openly bisexual women on mainstream reality television"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Danielle Sellers.

How is this thot notable?

How come a generic instagram influencer gets an article? WP:NOTE SynthGuard (talk) 17:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with the language you used as it is misogynistic for no reason. Despite that, I agree in asking how is Demi Sims’ sexuality notable? It doesn’t really fit with the other factoids in the section. Unknown Tornado (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. IAWW (talk) 18:27, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Demi Sims/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Launchballer (talk · contribs) 04:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 18:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. IAWW (talk) 18:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Launchballer, there are some suggestions below, but I found no issues relating to the GA criteria. Passing now. IAWW (talk) 18:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) clock

Lead

Quotes always need a citation, even if they are in the lead. I added this.

Life and career

Looks good :)

Sources Y

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) Y

No issues for GA

Reliability (Criterion 2b) Y

The authors I checked who had written for "Closer" appear to be qualified journalists. I don't see any issues.

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) Y

[2c]: Y

[10b]: Y

[4c]: Y

[24]: Y

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) Y

Earwig finds nothing and all the sources are online, so it's unlikely to have missed anything.

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) Y

Covers her whole life

Stable (Criterion 5) Y

Media Y

Tags (Criterion 6a) Y

Captions (Criterion 6b) Y

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

It's weird the description of the image doesn't actually say who it is. IAWW (talk) 18:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest archiving references to prevent link rot IAWW (talk) 18:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is some inconsistent linking of publishers IAWW (talk) 18:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.