Talk:Don Rees

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

"was"?

This article begins thus:

Dr. Donald "Don" Rees (B.Sc. Ph.D. D.I.C. A.R.C.S.) was

Yet he is reported, not very conspicuously, to be a living person. The article should begin like this:

Dr. Donald "Don" Rees (B.Sc. Ph.D. D.I.C. A.R.C.S.) is

Next issue: I just did some edits on the article titled Rees factor semigroup. That article begins with this:

In mathematics, in semigroup theory, a Rees factor semigroup (also called Rees quotient semigroup or just Rees factor) is a certain semigroup constructed using a semigroup and an ideal of the semigroup.

Obviously it should say:

In mathematics, in semigroup theory, a Rees factor semigroup (also called Rees quotient semigroup or just Rees factor), named after ?????? Rees, is a certain semigroup constructed using a semigroup and an ideal of the semigroup.

So here's the question: is this the right article to link to? Michael Hardy (talk) 01:55, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yep, "was"!

In response to your first issue: he is no longer Warden of Hugh Stewart Hall, as he retired in 2004. It would hardly be accurate to say that he still is. Perhaps it would be better phrased "is a former warden of Hugh Stewart Hall", but I don't think it reads as well.

In response to your second issue: I doubt it - in 2004 when he retired, he was presumably 65 (there had been plans to retire in 1999, at 60, I believe) which would suggest he was born around 1939. The article on Rees factor semigroups state that they were introduced by D. Rees in 1940, so unless he was a very talented baby, I suspect it was someone else. 128.243.21.224 (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]