Talk:Graphism thesis

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I don't think this is right.

I'm not an expert on this specific topic by any means, but I am a huge fan of Bruno Latour's work and kind of came to a couple of his conclusions in parallel.

Bruno Latour's work had one specific thesis-- the world can be represented by a network of networks. All of his other supporting concepts seem to buttress this specific point. As a major defining voice in Actor Network Theory, he wrote about this stuff a lot. Now, if you are familiar with Graph Theory, you'd know that it is network theory. Graphs are networks.

In this article though, this is not considered at all. This article says "science is when you have more charts", which is very reductive. Try thinking about the other interpretation of this concept and see if it's enlightening at all. Granteubanks (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]