This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2024.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
College students are not professional music critics. They are college kids trying to get extra credit by writing for their student newspapers. I don't see why these opinions are any better than any random Internet blogger's opinion—some editors suggest that we should include them because they (usually) have editors checking their work. So? They're not music publications and not music critics. I have removed the paragraph of college kids weighing in on the song, and if reinstated, I am making it clear I will actively oppose the article becoming a GA with their irrelevant opinions included. Ss11204:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear: I'm concerned about the use of college newspapers as sources on the rest of the article too but less so than including their opinions. Ss11205:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ss112: Fair enough. I was debating on whether or not if I should have even included them when I opted to take this on. I said yes initially because I felt initially they held some sort of value; but I do realize now that don't help too much. As for the others: I'll try to find something else if I can. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 06:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone please take a look at the composition section of the article? The genres sourced are not listed, and new wave doesn’t have a source. I don’t know why we’re ignoring the sources—they’re there for a reason. Stating that they are unsourced makes no sense because they are sourced. 2600:1002:A105:CFE5:B963:731F:A20D:C031 (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
