This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Should be good to go. I did some small copyedit/wikilink additions, and added a couple of third-party sources just to flesh out sourcing a tad but nominator did the work here in ensuring the article was new and long enough, and properly sourced and presentable. The hook is very interesting and properly sourced as well. Earwig shows low % for copyvio potential, and the QPQ has been completed. Soulbust (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
_part_2.jpg?lang=en){kind=small}
.jpg?lang=en){kind=small}
.jpg?lang=en)
Should be good to go. I did some small copyedit/wikilink additions, and added a couple of third-party sources just to flesh out sourcing a tad but nominator did the work here in ensuring the article was new and long enough, and properly sourced and presentable. The hook is very interesting and properly sourced as well. Earwig shows low % for copyvio potential, and the QPQ has been completed. Soulbust (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)