Talk:Neo-Nazism
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neo-Nazism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Chetniks was copied or moved into Neo-Nazism with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | Nazism is a far-right ideology. The consensus of political scientists, historians, and other reliable sources is that Nazism is a far-right ideology and not a left-wing or far-left one. This has been discussed numerous times. Please see this FAQ and read the talk page archives.Please do not request that "far-right" be changed to "left-wing" or "far-left"; your request will be denied, and you may be blocked from editing if you persist in doing so. |
![]() | "Nazi Party" is the English-language common name for the National Socialist German Workers Party. Per our policy, WP:COMMONNAME, English Wikipedia uses the common name in English for the titles of our articles, and in most references to that subject. Thus "Nazi Party" and "Nazism" are the names of our articles on those subjects, and in most instances the National Socialist German Workers Party is referred to as the Nazi Party, but occasionally, to avoid repetition, by the full English-language name, or by its German acronym, NSDAP.Please do not request that the name of this article be changed; such requests are routinely turned down. |
Finland had a notorious neo-Nazi leader Pekka Siitoin (1944-2003). He started as an ardent anticommunist who organized terror campaign against pro-communist media. In 1976 one of his followers burned communist printing house. Siitoin was jailed. After his release from prison in 1982, he demanded overthrow of goverment and forming a new regime based on fascism. He did get much media coverage. Si, he ended up calling himself the Fuehrer of Finland. He used swastika flag as his symbol and promoted nazism. He received lot of media coverage in the 1990s. However, he was out of date. He continued his neo-Nazism until his death (2003).
Source: Iiro Nordling; Long Shadow of Finland’s Fuehrer: Life and legacy of the notorious Finnish occult neo-Nazi Pekka Siitoin. Amazon 2021. ISBN 979-8546175634.
"In 2025, businessman Elon Musk's comments and remarks linked his relations with antisemitism conspiracy theories were criticized by international governments and several media outlets over the years."
This sentence is so ungrammatical as to be nearly incomprehensible. I'd make an edit request if I could figure out what it was even trying to say.
My best shot is "Elon Musk made comments linked to antisemitic conspiracy theories that have been criticized by international governments and media outlets." The "over the years" makes no sense, though. It can't refer to comments he made this year because he just made them and if it refers to the conspiracies, they've probably been criticized for decades, right? However it gets rephrased someone's got to take care of it, though, because that's not English. Ryonne (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Ryonne. In cases where a grammar disaster makes it hard to figure out what the sentence was even trying to say, one option is to ignore the sentence, read the source, and create a new sentence, which I have done in this case. And thank you for seeing this! Lova Falk (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
The poll that Wikipedia portrays as saying 9% of Americans support Neo Nazism is really just a poll of 1000 (a pretty small sample size to make claims for the entire country) people, of which 9% said holding Neo nazi views is acceptable. This should be changed to give a more accurate depiction of what that poll actually means.
https://www.axios.com/2017/12/15/9-of-americans-think-its-ok-to-hold-white-supremacist-or-neo-nazi-views-poll-1513304986 Polkol777 (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Polkol777. A sample size of 1000 is
notconsidered quite standard for national public opinion polls. The pdf says "Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points" that is, it could be up to 3.5% less or more. As this is a standard size for a poll, I won't change the text. Friendly, Lova Falk (talk) 16:37, 1 June 2025 (UTC)- "Is not considered quite standard" did you mean to say it is considered standard? I don't think putting this 1,000 person study as being representative of the entire country is fair. The text should more accurately reflect the sample size Polkol777 (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- You are correct about the mistake in my text, thank you for seeing that. However, 1000 is common for US polls. Others have been upset about this too: https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1b8uc5p/eli5_how_is_it_that_in_the_ussurveys_of_1000_are/ Friendly, Lova Falk (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- I will have to become a more seasoned editor to make this change then Polkol777 (talk) 05:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- You are correct about the mistake in my text, thank you for seeing that. However, 1000 is common for US polls. Others have been upset about this too: https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1b8uc5p/eli5_how_is_it_that_in_the_ussurveys_of_1000_are/ Friendly, Lova Falk (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- "Is not considered quite standard" did you mean to say it is considered standard? I don't think putting this 1,000 person study as being representative of the entire country is fair. The text should more accurately reflect the sample size Polkol777 (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- I thought Neo-Nazism had higher levels of support in the Southern United States, since the American Nazi Party is headquartered in Virginia, the openly Neo-Nazi White Patriot Party used to be active in Arkansas, and fellow Neo-Nazi organization Imperial Klans of America is headquartered in Kentucky. Dimadick (talk) 22:32, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It would be better to change "In 2017, following the Charlottesville car attack, an ABC News/Washington Post poll found out that 9% of all Americans supported the neo-Nazi ideology, which back then amounted to some 22 million Americans" to "In 2017, following the Charlottesville car attack, an ABC News/Washington Post poll found out that 9% of all Americans respected people's right to hold neo-Nazi ideology, which back then amounted to some 22 million Americans" - the source is about right to respect neo-Nazi views, not holding neo-Nazi ideology. Soldierneverdie1 (talk) 22:23, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Done – macaddct1984 (talk | contribs) 14:28, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- C-Class Jewish history-related articles
- Mid-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Mid-importance Crime-related articles
- C-Class Terrorism articles
- Mid-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Mid-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- C-Class Occult articles
- Mid-importance Occult articles
- WikiProject Occult articles