This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
@Dāsānudāsa @Chariotrider555 @Doug Weller @Chronikhiles can anyone of you revert the edit done by @Seyamar as that information is not unsourced, the reference is provided under reference no.21 in the article, I can't do that as I am not extend confirmed user. Firstly changing the image in article Vishnu with the regional image provided by the sockpuppet of @Vinayvinyill and now removing the sourced information from this article to appease the sockpuppet, this sockpuppet creates atleast 10 sock accounts everyday, vandalising the articles left and right and you are boosting his morale by basically giving up against his biased demands, what makes you think this sockpuppet will stop with his sectarian bias and vandalism in future? @SeyamarHbanm (talk) 19:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted those myself if they are sourced; I thought they lacked citations as other remarks had citations to them, earlier it didn't had all other except for god of destruction and supreme being. However, I have kept what I changed in consort field (RS from Doniger provided); other than that please feel to revert that if you think so. Yes, I will refrain myself from participating from pan-Hinduism related discussion and only focus on Mahabharata articles for which I joined the platform. Regards Seyamar(245CMR)💬📜20:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
just shut up you fool @Hbanm, i know you are anti vaishnavas, added less main info and old img for vishnu.
If they were removed as unsourced why you worried that link are provided under article, this shows that you are Shiva bhakt and vishnu dweshis, i already know that you edit hindi wiki on shiva page .
Is that shiva main info box word looks like whatsppp chat not looks like encyclopedia, adding 3 to 4 info source tip to vishnu and you added more than 7 info unnecessary for shiva , isnt unnecessary infobox crowding. Such as Patron of yog, bhog, master of arts, these are already described in articke then Why adding to top, why you didnt add to vishnu, answers me, if you didnt response or changes made, truth shows that all users are Vishnudveshis .
whats wrong with wiki users, why they promote supremacy, this user @Hbanm is shivaa devotee, this @Hbanm add so many content on sectarian bias with link, but why anyone not adding vishnu info, this shows you are jealous on lord vishnu, if you follow wikipedia rules, then add old image of shiva in wiki.
very politics, bad light and bad taste for me , this is not good, even encyclopedia is much better than wikipedia.
Yesterday i think, i never use wiki in future life, all are ok, but again revert and shows supremacy to shiva,
Answer my questions.
Why so much info on shiva while comparing to vishnu.
Why old image for vishnu, when good statue to shiva, if cant accept then add old img for shiva, stop supremecay, then will be justice and remove so much info on shiva, or add more info on vishnu equally to shiva, thats it..........................
Thanks, Good bye......................................................................
Shiva is destroyer of egoic structures. He reduces to ash through his fiery power. But is the future destroyer of the World. If he was destroyer of World , he would have been prayed as anti to Vishnu. I think book refer to him as fiercely powerful God, who destroys evil from world. Regenerates a better version of egoic powers. Like he did with KaamDev and Ravana, making them more humble by his powers.
Calling him destryoer in second para is incomplete
One of the source of J Gonda I checked and it calls him a absorber instead of destroyer.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Hi,I am one of your active users,I am an young genius and an Shaivite,I ask you to make me edit the page of Lord Shiva,my lord,I will praise him with help of trustable sources and some holy scriptures,please let me 2409:4051:10:E7AB:3889:D3FF:FE88:3D81 (talk) 01:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I would just like to make a simple change when it comes to Shiva's consort. I would like to state Parvati and Sati are not different consorts as Parvati is Sati's reincarnate version. In addition to this, I would to like to state Ganga is not universally accepted to be Shiva's wife. Shiva Puran's Rudra Samhita states only Parvati is his wife. Shiv Purana Source- https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/shiva-purana-english/d/doc226072.htmlHappyHasa (talk) 13:47, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Assuming you are talking about the consort field in the infobox, the explanatory note there already states that Parvati is a reincarnation of Sati and that Ganga is only sometimes considered a consort. Day Creature (talk) 01:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you. Melmann 22:18, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Assuming you are talking about the consort field in the infobox, the explanatory note there already states that Parvati is a reincarnation of Sati and that Ganga is only sometimes considered a consort. Day Creature (talk) 01:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)