Talk:Workforce modeling
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References justification for my edit
[edit]- Ernst, A.T., Jiang, H., Krishnamoorthy, M., & Sier, D. (2004). "Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models." European Journal of Operational Research, 153(1), 3-27.
This review says personnel scheduling is "the process of constructing work timetables for staff so that an organisation can satisfy the demand for its goods or services." Authors distinguish between basic scheduling approaches focused on time management to some more sophisticated workforce modeling approaches (incorporating multiple objectives and complex constraints)
- McKinsey & Company. "Smart Scheduling: How AI-Powered Optimization Can Transform Workforce Management."
This report says that traditional static planning models result in 60% of operating hours being either understaffed or overstaffed, while AI-driven workforce solutions require significantly less time and capture operational changes more efficiently.
- Pinedo, M. L. (2016). Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems (5th Edition). Springer.
The textbook documents the evolution from Henry Gantt's early time management charts to modern automated scheduling systems
- Algethami, H., Landa-Silva, D., & Martinez-Gavara, A. (2017). "Selecting Genetic Operators to Maximise Preference Satisfaction in a Workforce Scheduling and Routing Problem." ICORES 2017: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, Porto, Portugal, pp. 416–423.
Addresses interactive scheduling systems with algorithms that adapt to maximize "worker preference satisfaction" in scheduling decisions, supporting claims about workforce modeling incorporating worker interactivity beyond traditional approaches. Seedee3D (talk) 19:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)