Central Tibetan
Central Tibetan | |
---|---|
Ü-Tsang | |
དབུས་སྐད་, Dbus skad / Ükä དབུས་གཙང་སྐད་, Dbus-gtsang skad / Ü-tsang kä | |
![]() The name of the language written in the Tibetan script | |
Pronunciation | [wýkɛʔ, wýʔtsáŋ kɛʔ] |
Native to | Tibet, India, Nepal, China |
Region | Ngari, Ü-Tsang, Amdo, Kham, Himachal Pradesh |
Native speakers | (1.2 million cited 1990–2014)[1] |
Standard forms |
|
Tibetan script | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | Variously:bod – Lhasa Tibetandre – Dolpohut – Humla, Limilhm – Lhomi (Shing Saapa)muk – Mugom (Mugu)kte – Nubriola – Walungge (Gola)loy – Lowa/Loke (Mustang)tcn – Tichurong |
Glottolog | tibe1272 Tibetansout3216 South-Western Tibetic (partial match)basu1243 Basum |
ELP | Walungge |
Dolpo[2] | |
Lhomi[3] | |
![]() Shingsaba is classified as Vulnerable by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger |
Central Tibetan language, also known as Dbus Tibetan, Ü Tibetan or Ü-Tsang Tibetan, is the most widely spoken Tibetic language and the basis of Standard Tibetan.
Dbus is the Wylie spelling of the name in Tibetan script, དབུས་, whereas Ü is the pronunciation of the same in Lhasa dialect, [wy˧˥˧ʔ] (or [y˧˥˧ʔ]). All of these names are frequently applied specifically to the prestige dialect of Lhasa.
Varieties
[edit]- Dbus and Gtsang
There are many mutually intelligible Central Tibetan languages besides that of Lhasa, with particular diversity along the border and in Nepal:
- Limi (Limirong), Mugum, Dolpo (Dolkha), Mustang (Lowa, Lokä), Humla, Nubri, Lhomi, Dhrogpai Gola, Walungchung Gola (Walungge/Halungge), Tseku
- Basum (most divergent, possibly a separate language)
Ethnologue reports that Walungge is highly intelligible with Thudam.
Glottolog reports these South-Western Tibetic languages as forming a separate subgroup of languages within Central Tibetan languages, but that Thudam is not a distinct variety. On the opposite, Glottolog does not classify Basum within Central Tibetan but leaves it unclassified within Tibetic languages.
Tournadre (2013) classifies Tseku with Khams.[4]
Central Tibetan has 70% lexical similarity with Amdo Tibetan and 80% lexical similarity with Khams Tibetan.[5]
Qu & Jing (2017), a comparative survey of Central Tibetan lects, documents the Lhasa, Shigatse, Gar, Sherpa, Basum, Gertse, and Nagqu varieties.[6]
Ngari Tibetan
[edit]Ngari Tibetan refers to a group of Tibetic dialects spoken in Ngari Prefecture, located in the westernmost part of the T.A.R, China.
Although traditionally grouped under Central Tibetan (Dbusgtsang), Ngari varieties are considered more conservative and divergent, retaining several archaic features not found in Lhasa Tibetan.
Some linguists have noted that dialects such as those spoken in Gêrzê County show transitional features between Central and Western Tibetan. However, the inclusion of dialects like Nagqu Tibetan, which is generally categorized under Central Tibetan proper, in a broader “Ngari areal group” is not widely accepted in current linguistic classifications.
A related set of dialects is spoken in India’s Himachal Pradesh, particularly in the Spiti Valley and upper Kinnaur. These dialects share a close historical and linguistic relationship with Western Tibetic varieties of Ngari, though they have developed separately over time due to geographic and political separation.
These Indian varieties are commonly referred to under exonyms such as Lahuli–Spiti or Kinnauri Tibetan, and are often treated as distinct Western Tibetic languages.
Consonants
[edit]
|
|
- འ isn't commonly transliterated to Roman, in the Wade–Giles system ' is used.
Vowels
[edit]ཨ(◌)
ཨ། | ཨའུ། | ཨག། ཨགས། |
ཨང༌། ཨངས། |
ཨབ། ཨབས། |
ཨམ། ཨམས། |
ཨར། | ཨལ། ཨའི། |
ཨད། ཨས། |
ཨན། |
a | au | ag | aŋ | ab | am | ar | ai/ä | ai/ä | ain/än |
ཨི། ཨིལ། ཨའི། |
ཨིའུ། ཨེའུ། |
ཨིག། ཨིགས། |
ཨིང༌། ཨིངས། |
ཨིབ། ཨིབས། |
ཨིམ། ཨིམས། |
ཨིར། | ཨིད། ཨིས། |
ཨིན། | |
i | iu | ig | iŋ | ib | im | ir | i | in | |
ཨུ། | ཨུག། ཨུགས། |
ཨུང༌། ཨུངས། |
ཨུབ། ཨུབས། |
ཨུམ། ཨུམས། |
ཨུར། | ཨུལ། ཨུའི།[VOW 1] |
ཨུད། ཨུས། |
ཨུན། | |
u | ug | uŋ | ub | um | ur | ü | ü | ün | |
ཨེ། ཨེལ། ཨེའི། |
ཨེག། ཨེགས། |
ཨེང༌། ཨེངས། |
ཨེབ། ཨེབས། |
ཨེམ། ཨེམས། |
ཨེར། | ཨེད། ཨེས། |
ཨེན། | ||
ê | êg | êŋ | êb | êm | êr | ê | ên | ||
ཨོ། | ཨོག། ཨོགས། |
ཨོང༌། ཨོངས། |
ཨོབ། ཨོབས། |
ཨོམ། ཨོམས། |
ཨོར། | ཨོལ། ཨོའི། |
ཨོད། ཨོས། |
ཨོན། | |
o | og | oŋ | ob | om | or | oi/ö | oi/ö | oin/ön |
- ^ 特殊
Pronunciation
[edit]IPA | Wade–Giles | Tibetan Pinyin | IPA | Wade–Giles | Tibetan Pinyin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[a] | a | a | |||
[ɛ] | al, a'i | ai/ä | [ɛ̃] | an | ain/än |
[i] | i, il, i'i | i | [ĩ] | in | in |
[u] | u | u | |||
[y] | ul, u'i | ü | [ỹ] | un | ün |
[e] | e, el, e'i | ê | [ẽ] | en | ên |
[o] | o | o | |||
[ø] | ol, o'i | oi/ö | [ø̃] | on | oin/ön |
一"ai, ain, oi, oin" is also written to "ä, än, ö, ön".
Conjunct vowels
[edit]IPA | Wade–Giles | Tibetan Pinyin |
---|---|---|
[au] | a'u | au |
[iu] | i'u, e'u | iu |
Last consonant
[edit]IPA | Wade–Giles | Tibetan Pinyin |
---|---|---|
[ʔ] | d, s | none |
[n] | n | |
[k/ʔ] | g, gs | g |
[ŋ] | ng, ngs | ng |
[p] | b, bs | b |
[m] | m, ms | m |
[r] | r | r |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Lhasa Tibetan at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Dolpo at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Humla, Limi at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Lhomi (Shing Saapa) at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Mugom (Mugu) at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023)
Nubri at Ethnologue (26th ed., 2023) - ^ Endangered Languages Project data for Dolpo.
- ^ Endangered Languages Project data for Lhomi.
- ^ N. Tournadre (2005) "L'aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes." Lalies, 2005, n°25, p. 7–56 [1]
- ^ "China". Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Nineteenth Edition. 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-09-09.
- ^ Qu, Aitang 瞿霭堂; Jing, Song 劲松. 2017. Zangyu Weizang fangyan yanjiu 藏语卫藏方言研究. Beijing: Zhongguo Zangxue chubanshe 中国藏学出版社. ISBN 9787802534230.