User:Armeym/sandbox
Personal Resource Center
[edit]Best Practices & MOS
[edit]- Wikipedia:Manual of Style
- Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources WP:RELIABILITY
- Wikipedia:Citing sources WP:CS WP:CITE WP:REF
- Help:Footnotes
- Wikipedia:Inline citation
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view WP:NPOV WP:Neutrality (Template:POV {POV})
- Conflict of Interest Guide WP:PLAINSIMPLECOI
- WP:COPYEDIT
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch MOS:WEASEL
- Wikipedia:Relevance of content, Wikipedia:Relevance, Wikipedia:Out of scope (OOS), WP:TOPIC / WP:OFFTOPIC, Wikipedia:WikiProject scope creep
- Sources are addressed in body: MOS:CITELEAD MOS:INTRO
- Articles worth existing/being written: Wikipedia:Notability
- MOS:BLOCKQUOTE
- Formality: WP:TONE WP:SLANG
- Don't surprise readers: Principle of least astonishment WP:ASTONISH WP:SURPRISE
- How'd I get here? (Redirects): WP:RASTONISH WP:RSURPRISE
- Crime: WP:CRIME WP:VICTIM WP:PERPETRATOR WP:CRIMINAL
- Labelling Criminals: Wikipedia:Crime labels MOS:CRIMINAL MOS:CONVICTEDFELON
- Anti-Victimization: WP:AVOIDVICTIM WP:VICTIMIZE
- Innocent Until Proven Guilty (also: no pre-guilt crime references for non-public figures) : WP:BLPCRIME WP:SUSPECT
- WP:COMMONNAME
- Wikipedia:Recentism
- WP:IMPROVEIT WP:PRESERVE WP:POTENTIAL WP:FIXIT Wikipedia:Somebody else's problem
- User:Jimbo Wales/Statement of principles
- Wikipedia:Etiquette WP:COURTESY
- Wikipedia:Vandalism WP:VANDAL
- Wikipedia:Disruptive editing WP:DISRUPTIVE
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not WP:PROMOTION WP:NOTADVERT WP:NOTPROMO WP:SOAPBOX WP:NOTADVOCACY WP:NOTOPINION WP:NOTSCANDAL WP:NOTCENSORED
- Wikipedia:Civility WP:CIVIL WP:NICE WP:POLITE
- Wikipedia:Conflict of interest WP:COI
- Wikipedia:Assume good faith WP:GOODFAITH
- Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers WP:BITE WP:NOBITING WP:DONTBITE WP:NEWBIES
- Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
- Wikipedia:Editor integrity
- Wikipedia:Copyright violations
- Wikipedia:Article titles WP:CRITERIA
- Wikipedia:Merging Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers
- Wikipedia:No disclaimers
- Wikipedia:Spoiler
Misc
[edit]- Icons
Running with scissors is too dangerous for Wikipedia! - Redirect Page Maker and How-to
- Wikipedia:List_of_discussion_templates
- Wikipedia:Template index/Maintenance
- Wikipedia:Barnstars
Sign using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the current date.
Use {Col-begin} {Col-break} {col-end} for columns.
| Main namespace | |
|---|---|
| Other namespaces | |
| All namespaces | |
| Navboxes with templates |
|
| Inline images | |
| Help pages | |
| Related topics | |
| Search | |
Tutorials
[edit]- Introductory tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Writing an article
- Five pillars of Wikipedia
- Community portal
- Help pages
- The Teahouse (newcomer help)
- Main help desk
Administrative
[edit]- User reporting for vandalism
- Wikipedia:Arbitration
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard
- Wikipedia:Protection policy, Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase, [Protection Request Forum]
- Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard - For determining whether a specific editor has a conflict of interest (COI) for an article.
You are not logged in or registered. You can log in or create an account here.You are logged in.
Pending changes protected
You are not logged in, so you are not autoconfirmed. Your account is autoconfirmedis not autoconfirmed.
Semi-protected
You are not logged in, so you are not extended confirmed. Your account is extended confirmed.does not have the extended confirmed flag, but you are an administrator, so your account is extended confirmed by default.
Extended confirmed protected
| Unregistered or newly registered | Confirmed or autoconfirmed | Extended confirmed | Template editor ★ | Admin | Interface admin | Appropriate for (See also: Wikipedia:Protection policy) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No protection | Normal editing | The vast majority of pages. This is the default protection level. | |||||
 Pending changes
|
All users can edit Edits by unregistered or newly registered editors (and any subsequent edits by anyone) are hidden from readers who are not logged in until reviewed by a pending changes reviewer or administrator. Logged-in editors see all edits, whether accepted or not. |
Infrequently edited pages with high levels of vandalism, BLP violations, edit-warring, or other disruption from unregistered and new users. | |||||
 Semi
|
Cannot edit | Normal editing | Pages that have been persistently vandalized by anonymous and registered users. Some highly visible templates and modules. | ||||
 Extended confirmed
|
Cannot edit | Normal editing | Specific topic areas authorized by ArbCom, pages where semi-protection has failed, or high-risk templates where template protection would be too restrictive. | ||||
 Template
|
Cannot edit | Normal editing | High-risk or very-frequently used templates and modules. Some high-risk pages outside of template space. | ||||
 Full
|
Cannot edit | Can edit♦ | Pages with persistent disruption from extended confirmed accounts. | ||||
 Interface
|
Cannot edit | Normal editing | Scripts, stylesheets, and similar objects fundamental to operation of the site or that are in other editors' user spaces. | ||||
| ★ The table assumes a template editor also has extended confirmed privileges, which is almost always the case in practice. ♦ Administrators are only authorized to perform non-controversial edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page. | |||||||
| Other modes of protection:
| |||||||
Warning templates
|
Infoboxes & Flags
[edit]Works in Progress
[edit]- Inline, comment-level templates
Task complete.
Being worked on- Template:Done/See also
- Template:Resolved/See also
- Template:In use
- Template:Under construction Being reconstructed over time, replace with IN USE when actually editing.
- Template:Recently revised
Current Events, Recentism, & Speculation
[edit]- Wikipedia:Current event templates {Current related} {current} {Current event editnotice}
- Wikipedia:Recentism WP:RECENTISM
- Template:Recentism
This article appears to be slanted towards recent events. - Template:Speculation
This article possibly contains unsourced predictions, speculative material, or accounts of events that might not occur. Information must be verifiable and based on reliable published sources.
Span Flags
[edit]- Template:Multiple issues
- Template:Copyedit
This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. - Template:Context
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. - Template:Technical This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.
- Template:More citations needed
This article needs additional citations for verification. (May 2024) - Template:Cite check
Use when the article or section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations
- Template:self-published
This article may contain excessive or inappropriate references to self-published sources. - Template:primary sources This article relies excessively on references to primary sources.
- Template:one source This article relies largely or entirely on a single source.
- Template:BLP
- Template:Third-party This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral.
- Template: Unreferenced
- Template:Unreferenced section
- Template:More citations needed This article needs additional citations for verification.
- Template:More citations needed section This section needs additional citations for verification.
- Template:Sources exist An editor has performed a search and found that sufficient sources exist to establish the subject's notability.
- Template:Update
This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. (August 2016) - Template:Update section
Parts of this user page (those related to this section) need to be updated. The reason given is: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ). Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. (April 2024) - Template:Confusing This article may be confusing or unclear to readers.This article may be confusing or unclear to readers.
- Template:Overly detailed This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience.
- Template:Very long This page may be too long to read and navigate comfortably.
- Template: Very long section This section may be too long to read and navigate comfortably.
- Template:Subsections This section needs to be divided into subsections.
- Template:Sections This article needs to be divided into sections.
- Template: Very long section
- Template:Long plot This article's plot summary may be too long or excessively detailed.
- Template:Too many see alsos
- Template:Lead too long Template:Lead too short This article's lead section may be too long.
This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. - Template:Expand section
![[icon]](/media/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1c/Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg/44px-Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg.png)
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. - Template:Missing information
This article is missing information about ABC. - Template:How-to This article contains instructions, advice, or how-to content.
- Template:Fan POV This article may be written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view.
- Template:POV
The neutrality of this article is disputed. - Template:Weasel This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information.
- Template:Cleanup reorganize Template:Cleanup Template:Organize section
![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg?lang=en){kind=small}
 | This section may be in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. |
| This article may be in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. |
| This user page may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Unusual formatting, repetition and overuse of terms like "for example". Please help improve this user page if you can; the talk page may contain suggestions. |
- Template:Confusing
to mark sections (or entire articles, though this is undesirable because it makes it unclear what exactly needs to be improved)This article may be confusing or unclear to readers. - Template:Globalize
The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with countries with federal governments, particularly Australia and the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (January 2024) - Template:advert This article contains promotional content.
Notice and Warning Templates
[edit]
For messages indicating e.g. that errors or misuse may have wide repercussions.
{{{1}}}
For notices relating to consensus about methods, procedures, editing, etc.
{{{1}}}
For significant information.
{{{1}}}
For particularly significant warnings.{{{1}}} 
Warning Inline version of Warning.
Mini Span Flags
[edit]- Template:Expand section
![[icon]](/media/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1c/Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg/20px-Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg.png)
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. - Template:Expand list
- Template:Very long
This section is too long. Consider splitting it into new pages, adding subheadings, or condensing it.
Inline Flags
[edit]
- [needs context]
- [jargon]
- [needs copy edit]
- [additional citation(s) needed] - the present source is insufficient but should be retained
- [not specific enough to verify] - a reference is too imprecise or ambiguous to enable it to be verified
- [better source needed]
- [clarification needed] to mark individual phrases or sentences
- [definition needed] to mark a term as ambiguous or unclear and in need of a definition
- [example needed] to mark individual phrases or sentences which require examples for clarification
- [further explanation needed] to mark individual phrases or sections which require further explanation for general (i.e. non-expert) readers
- [non sequitur] to mark individual mentions of someone or something in an out-of-context way, the relevance of which is unclear
- [example needed]
- [clarification needed]
- [who?] [when?] [where?] [how?] [why?]
- Wikipedia:Vagueness [vague] [specify]
- Wikipedia:Citation needed [citation needed]
- words[citation needed]
- Template:Failed verification [failed verification]
- test[failed verification]: Use when inline citations have been supplied which support some portion of the statement in question, but not all of it.
- [text–source integrity?]: Use when multiple inline citations to a source are given, but not all of them support the same information.
- [unreliable source?]: Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.
- [unreliable source]: Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is an unreliable source.
- [verification needed]
- [dead link]
- [excessive detail?]
Hatnotes, Disambiguation, & Clarity
[edit]- Template:hatnote
- Template:see also
- Template:Broader
- Template:Further
- Template:For
- Template:Other uses
- Template:About
- Template:Distinguish
- Template:About-distinguish
- Template:Redirect
- Template:Redirect-multi
mbox
[edit] | AAA |