Jump to content

User talk:Bioleaderpack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, Bioleaderpack!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies on a blue and white striped plate. The plate sits on a beige surface.
Have a plate of cookies!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Bioleaderpack! I'm Ozzie10aaaa, and I've been assigned as your mentor. All new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

  1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
  2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
  3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
  4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PLA cups (June 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Bioleaderpack! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bioleaderpack (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked for promotional editing. My intention was to contribute factual, referenced content on sustainable packaging materials. I apologize if my edits appeared promotional and I will avoid using my company website as a source in the future. I am committed to strictly following Wikipedia’s neutral point of view and content guidelines, and I request a second chance to participate constructively. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Your replies here have been written with an AI.(85% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you directly. Please write without using an AI. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your intention was clearly to create articles for the various product categories you sell, with a spam link to your website included in each.
Speaking of links, most of the source links in your drafts don't work (except the ones to your website, of course, those work just fine) – I have to ask, did you use AI to generate these drafts, by any chance? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:34, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello DoubleGrazing,
Thank you for your feedback and for reviewing my unblock request.
I'd like to clarify that the drafts I submitted were written based on my personal knowledge and professional experience in the sustainable packaging industry, accumulated over many years of working directly with these products. My goal was to contribute informative, well-sourced content to the Wikipedia community on a topic I understand deeply.
I did use AI tools, but only to assist with grammar correction and to help refine the structure and neutrality of the language—not to generate the entire content. Every draft was initially written by me. I’m aware of Wikipedia’s standards regarding original research and neutrality, and I have no intention of misusing AI or submitting unverified content.
Regarding the source links: I did my best to include only reliable sources, many of which are from government websites, international NGOs, and industry-standard organizations. I will double-check any that may not be loading properly and make sure all references are verifiable, publicly accessible, and appropriate per Wikipedia’s sourcing policy.
I truly value the mission of Wikipedia and wish to contribute constructively. I welcome any suggestions for improving the articles or revising them under supervision, without linking to any commercial sites. Thank you again for the opportunity to clarify.
Best Regards,
Junso Zhang Bioleaderpack (talk) 09:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Edition team,
I appreciate your quick reply. I see where the worry is coming from.
The drafts stem from years I spent tinkering with eco-friendly packaging. I bottled up what I've learned, added only a quick grammar polish with AI, and called it done.
About the sources, the links land on government, trade group, or other trustworthy pages. I'll sweep the list again, fix any dead links, and line everything up with your style sheet,and make sure that all references are verifiable, publicly accessible, and appropriate per Wikipedia’s sourcing policy.Do not link to any commercial sites.
Thanks for your reading. Im ready to tweak any section if the final read still feels off.
Thanks again! Bioleaderpack (talk) 12:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]