User talk:BurningB

Welcome!

Hello, BurningB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 10:04, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, P. P. Chaudhary, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coolie (2025 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Epicion (talk) 09:09, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2025 Kolkata gang rape has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2025 Kolkata gang rape. Thanks! jolielover♥talk 10:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolkata First Division Cricket League (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It requires significant coverage about the topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kolkata First Division Cricket League and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BurningB! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2025 Kolkata gang rape has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2025 Kolkata gang rape. Thanks! ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 15:15, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 Kolkata gang rape (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If this can meet the notability criteria, it will take some time to show it meets WP:LASTING and not fail WP:NOTNEWS or WP:NCRIME. S0091 (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 Kolkata gang rape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 Kolkata gang rape (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please don't resubmit immediately after receiving a decline. You're going to have to wait at least several weeks to know whether this event is actually notable in any lasting way. See WP:NOTNEWS]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 Kolkata gang rape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goldmines Telefilms has been accepted

Goldmines Telefilms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to 2026 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 08:35, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. But the 2021 election was written under the same name, so why is it more difficult to follow?BurningB (talk) 08:39, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Regarding your move of London River to London River (film), your edit summary stated that disambiguation was needed, but there's no other article about a subject with the same name as far as I can tell. Could you clarify? Cordless Larry (talk) 15:28, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it thinking London River might usually mean the Thames, so added the (film) for clarity. I apologise if I made a mistake. BurningB (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any evidence that people are looking up the article thinking it's about the Thames (and I can't recall ever hearing anyone refer to the Thames as London River). Cordless Larry (talk) 15:48, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, moving the article wouldn't help anyone looking for the river, unless you proposed to make London River a disambiguation page. There's already a Template:For-text note for readers at the top of the page. I've reverted the move. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Aniruddhchaudhuy per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aniruddhchaudhuy. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 19:53, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]