User talk:CPDJay

Welcome!

Hi CPDJay! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Dam222 🌋 (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sues Canal massacre

Hello sir, if you go to the pages of Yom Kippur War and see the Egyptian atrocities you will find the references. Also for the Ras Sedr Massacre page when the reference of Egyptian officers admitting killings of Israeli prisoners in retaliation to the killings of Egyptian pows in previous wars. VictoriousSkull (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you find the references there, please add them. It is the responsibility of new article creator to go out there and find sources for their article. The guideline is that every information on Wikipedia must be referenced to credible and easily verifiable sources. CPDJay (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Movement of new page

Is there a particular reason for moving the McArthur page to draft? VaguelyNorthern (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It needs more independent secondary sources as the current sources are primary sources CPDJay (talk) 13:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FOCJ - unreliable sources?

Hi, you complained of unreliable sources in the FOCJ article, but there is no talk page comment identifying the sources you consider unreliable. Can you please add one? Wvdveer (talk) 21:26, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the unreliable sources

CPDJay (talk) 08:09, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]