User talk:Codonified

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Happy New Year!

Codonified,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Nyxion³⁰³ 💬 Talk 10:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot😀❤️ Codonified (talk) 13:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for being silly enough to ask to be trouted 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And for not, so far as I can tell, initiating the necessary sockpuppetry investigations you mentioned on my talk page 😈🤡😇 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, so sigma that i skibidi 🗣️🗣️🗣️ Codonified (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Er, yes 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parambassis baculis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pool. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

🤖 Codonified (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Specific names

Hi, from the discussion on my request to delete Barilius pectoralis I have an inkling that some clarification on how species names work might be helpful. I did not know this until I started editing articles on Wikipedia and anither editor explianed this to me. I may be completely wrong about that but anyway.....

A species is described by a biologist, Anders Andersen, and it is assigned it to a genus, say Johnius smithius A. Andersen, 2025, another biologist, Bertrand Beauchamps, studies this species and finds that it should be in a different genus, Jamesius, so the species name is changed to Jamesius smithius (A. Andersen, 2025). The species is still the same, it is the same name smithius and relies on the validity of the original species description. The name of the author in parentheses indicates that the genus has been changed. Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you bro, you are very kind.

I really appreciate you taking your time to teach me.

:D

Codonified (talk) 21:26, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Classification of pottery (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Classification of pottery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:50, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Codonified! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:50, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Epic History TV

Hello, Codonified. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Epic History TV, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]