User talk:Creative Contents

Welcome!

Hello, Creative Contents!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 19:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Please start a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion rather than repeatedly attempting to edit Georgina Willis directly. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:28, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly lead me through, as i do not quite know how to Creative Contents (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are very detailed instructions on that page: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#How to list a redirect for discussion. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't initially clear to me what you were trying to do, but I think I understand now given your explanation at RfD and this edit. Because there is no existing page for Georgina Willis, would recommend first drafting a high-quality one, then tackling the question of the redirect. Please review WP:YFA and strongly consider going through WP:AFC as a paid editor with apparently little experience editing Wikipedia. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have the link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Willis_Read) seems I mistakenly deleted the page when I made the first edit. Creative Contents (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make sense to redirect "Georgina Willis" to "Georgia Willis Read". Georgina and Georgia are two different names. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please can i use my other account for the edits as this is too complex for me Creative Contents (talk) 17:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your other account? GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:11, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems I might have to create a new account, I cannot seem to access the other account Creative Contents (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What was the name of the other account? Was it Pradorz? GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not that but something with The beloved Creative Contents (talk) 17:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well please be aware of our policy on multiple accounts. There is no need for you to create a new account; this one works perfectly well. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also avoiding that. So please what do you suggest I do for the changes? Creative Contents (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If your goal is to create a biographical article for Georgina Willis, you can follow the instructions at WP:AFC. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, Willis already has it's own page whis is this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Willis_Read Creative Contents (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again, "Georgia" is not the same name as "Georgina". GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, saw the confusion I meant to type Georgia Creative Contents (talk) 17:40, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So do you understand now why it doesn't make sense to alter the redirect target of Georgina Willis from Watermark (2003 film) to Georgia Willis Read? Does that resolve what you were trying to do? GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:42, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks for your precious time Creative Contents (talk) 17:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please I have a new question which you might be able to have answers too, does "Georgina Willis" ever existed on wiki so as to know what to inform my client Creative Contents (talk) 18:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there was a very brief article about her in May, which was replaced with a redirect because it did not demonstrate she meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks GorillaWarfare, My confusion now has an answer now, really appreciate Creative Contents (talk) 18:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello good morning Creative Contents (talk) 06:26, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I requested for the Georgina willis page be restored. I haven't yet gotten a feedback. I want to make improvements to the page to meet wikis notability standard. please kindly help

Regards,

Creative Contentss Creative Contents (talk) 06:28, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the old revisions of the page to Draft:Georgina Willis, where you can work on bringing it up to Wikipedia standards and request review once you think it's ready. Before you begin, you also need to more adequately disclose the circumstances of your paid editing, per WP:PAID, which requires you explicitly disclose your "employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any paid contribution to Wikipedia". You can do this by adding this template to your user page: {{paid|employer=Name of your employer|client=Name of your client, if different from your employer}}, replacing the fields with the required details. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:29, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so, can i go on making the edits now? Creative Contents (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, go for it. Thanks for updating the disclosure. I'd recommend reading WP:YFA so you understand what's required for new pages. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I have submitted for review., Hope it gets accepted Creative Contents (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Spotemgottem. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Georgina Willis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Spotemgottem (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgina Willis (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgina Willis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Creative Contents! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what area are you specifically reffering to? Creative Contents (talk) 18:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You had two dead sources which you have fixed. However you currently just have one passing mention, one interview (so not independent) and one other source so not enough to show notability. You need sources to show how they pass the criteria per Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals or Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Basic_criteria. KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so now has the article been rejected again Creative Contents (talk) 19:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had not reviewed again as I saw you ask this, but yes it will probably be declined again unless the someone else adds more sources. I did have a quick look but the only 'news' source I found was on a blacklisted site. KylieTastic (talk) 19:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

which news source, Is it ABC you're referring to? Creative Contents (talk) 19:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No I found one on "London Post" called "Georgina Willis creates a floating film Studio to Film Insect O Cide" then found it was blacklisted. KylieTastic (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgina Willis (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgina Willis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 19:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]