User talk:Currenteventful
Supreme Court Statements
[edit]Someone did delete a block of text. In the comment for the edit, they took the discussion to the article's talk page.
Instead of just putting the text back, you should at least read what they said and why they removed the text before doing so.
Here's a link to that discussion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Deportation_of_Kilmar_Abrego_Garcia#Supreme_Court_brief_quotes_in_intro Bob drobbs (talk) 19:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- intentionally swaying opinion with one sided facts is just as bad as putting no facts at all and just putting your opinions out there. Currenteventful (talk) 23:19, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Raph Williams65. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – Raphael 00:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- "constructive" vs. hiding the truth of the matter, well done Currenteventful (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Raphael 00:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, you may be blocked from editing.
Welcome!
[edit]
|