User talk:DXanda

Black Adam

MOS:FILMAUDIENCE prohibits using Rotten Tomatoes audience score due to concerns over vite stacking and demographic skew. Even if a verified category is placed people can still stack it by buying multiple tickets and making fake accounts. We've already included PostTrak and Cinemascore audience reaction. Please don't add back the RT audience score again. There can be an exception as some reliable sources have stated that it's scored well among audiences on RT. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 09:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Callanecc. I noticed that in this edit to Black Adam (film), you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Six. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you think that the page should be deleted, please have a look at the following guide:

Wikipedia:How to delete a page

If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saracen (Muzzafar Lambert)

Hello, DXanda,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dawkin Verbier, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Saracen (Muzzafar Lambert) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dawkin Verbier}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dawkin Verbier (talk) 08:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for reverting "my" previous edits, because that's not me. My dad was doing that in purpose, he wanted me to get blocked because he hates me editing wiki. I'm terribly sorry for what that jerk did. DXanda 12:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Please see WP:BROTHER and WP:ROLE. You're expected to control your account's security so that you are the only one using it. Accounts that are used by more than one person are considered compromised and will be blocked. Please see Wikipedia:User account security for advice on how to secure your account. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He took away my phone while I was editing, so he was able to edit. My account wasn't used by more than one person. DXanda (talk) 13:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Chaetodipus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to DC Universe (franchise)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —chaetodipus (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —chaetodipus (talk) 10:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at DC Universe (franchise). —chaetodipus (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 10:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DXanda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That wasn't me who did those stupid Vandaliam shits, I promise that this won't happen again. Now, I really need my account unblocked so that I can do contributions more conveniently in Chinese Wiki, pretty please?

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know. As you are aware from reading WP:COMPROMISED, this is the end of the line. No further unblock requests will be considered as you allowed your account to be compromised. Yamla (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DXanda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you at least unblock the IP address? So that I can use another account to contribute? You guys are making me very inconvenient to contribute in Chinese wiki! Oh and by the way, I definitely didn't "allow" my dad grabbing my phone and do those vandalism shits, ASIAN PARENTS!!!

Decline reason:

No, we won't do that to allow you to evade the block, as we have no way of knowing if you are the person who took control of the account or not. Please see WP:COMPROMISED if you haven't already. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DXanda (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Oh hell yea, of course it's possible that I suddenly wanted to delete the whole "DC Universe" page, I'm just a guy who had made more than 9000 edits in Chinese wiki and is the only editor who is doing expand works in all Marvel and DC pages since mid-2022, why wouldn't I do that when I'm editing in the Chinese "DC Universe" page that I created the whole thing by my own?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This account is compromised and not eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You seem to be indicating someone else had control of your account and made those edits. Is that what you are saying? See WP:COMPROMISED. --Yamla (talk) 15:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My dad grabbed my phone away while I was editing. This won't happen again, please just unblock me. --DXanda (talk) 00:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Your account is considered WP:COMPROMISED and therefore won't be unblocked. This is the end of the line now. Any subsequent unblock requests made here or elsewhere will be declined. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 00:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making unblock requests. We will not consider them; see WP:COMPROMISED. Additionally, you are not permitted to modify or remove declined unblock requests, such as you did here. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification; I see no evidence that you modified a declined unblock request. My sincere apologies for stating otherwise. --Yamla (talk) 12:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, but what I was asking for was just my ID unblocked, instead of my account unblocked. I want to use another account to continue contributing, please can I be allowed to do so?--DXanda (talk) 12:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you refuse to follow directions, I have protected this page from your further disruption for one month. --Yamla (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]